Lloyd v Stanbury
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1971 |
| Year | 1971 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Anglia Television Ltd v Reed
...the expenditure so wasted and thrown away. This view is supported by the recent decision of Mr. Justice Brightman in ( Lloyd v. Stanbury 1971 1 W.L.R. 535). There was a contract for the sale of land. In anticipation of the contract - and before it was concluded-the purchaser went to much ex......
-
Perrault (June) v Derrick Fearon and Arlene Gaynor
...be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time of the contract: see Diamond v Campbell-Jones [1961] Ch., 22; Lloyd v Stanbury [1971] 1WLR, 535. Where there is merely a delay in completion, the purchaser is entitled to recover damages for the delay: Jones v Gardi......
-
Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Company Ltd
...wasted expenditure is different from Baron Parke's principle in Robinson v Harman. 38 The second authority relied upon by Mr. Brenton is Lloyd v Stanbury [1971] 1 WLR 535. However, the extent to which this case can be regarded as authoritative is limited by the circumstance that the discuss......
- Bloom (Kosher) & Sons Ltd v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
CLARIFYING RECTIFICATION IN SINGAPORE
...of the parties, it must be shown that the written contract was actually contrary to the intention of the parties — see Lloyd v Stanbury[1971] 1 WLR 535. (d) There must be a literal disparity between the terms of the prior agreement and those of the document which it is sought to rectify. In......