Lloyds Bank v Institute of Cancer Research ; Re Dellow's Will Trusts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1964 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
190 cases
-
[1] The Hon. Gaston Browne, Leader of the Opposition [2] The Hon. Lester B. Bird [3] The Hon. Asot A. Michael [4] Mr. Eisen Baptiste [5] Ms. Paulet Hinkson Appellants/Applicants v [1] The Constituencies Boundaries Commission [2] Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda [3] The Speaker of the House of Representatives [4] The Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda Attorney General (for and on Behalf of her Excellency the Governor General) Respondents [ECSC]
...this ground of appeal also fails. In re H. and Others (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563 applied; and In re Dellow's Will Trusts [1964] 1 WLR 451 applied. 4. The test for establishing apparent bias is whether a fair minded and informed observer would consider that th......
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Botnar
... ... fund by resettling whole or part of it on trusts which might include an excluded person as a ... 1 to 151 of their decision and which I will not repeat here. It is the central contention of ... ...
-
A Local Authority v B (1st Respondent) C (2nd Respondent) a Child, D, through her Children's Guardian, (3rd Respondent)
...at para [2] per Lord Hoffmann. iii) The more serious or improbable the allegation the greater the need for evidential 'cogency': Re Dellow's Will Trusts; Lloyd's Bank v Institute of Cancer Research [1964] 1 WLR 451 at 455; Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563, [199......
- B v B
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
The Standard of Proof in Civil Cases: An Insurance Fraud Perspective
...FRAUD PERSPECTIVE47 [1996] AC 563.48 [2008] UKHL 35, [2009] AC 11.49 [2009] UKSC 17, [2010] 1 AC 678.50 Re Dellow’s Will Trusts [1964] 1 WLR 451 at 455, per Ungoed Thomas rule of proof provides that the worse the abuse, the less likely that the child can beprotected by removal from its pare......
-
The burden of proof in market abuse cases
...379.4. Addington v. Texas [1966] 441 US 418.5. [1951] CA 35, 2 All ER 458.JFC20,4386 6. Lord Denning in Blyth v. Blyth [1966] AC 643.7. [1964] 1 WLR 451 at 455.8. [1957] 1 QB 247 at 266.9. [1981] 1 WLR 505 at 514.10. [1957] EWCA Civ 1605, [2006] QB 468 at 498 para 64.11. In Re H (Minors) (S......
-
BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARD OF PROOF IN CIVIL LITIGATION
...on the balance of probability, its occurrence will be established. Ungoed-Thomas J expressed this neatly in In re Dellow's Will Trusts[1964] 1 WLR 451 [at] 455: The more serious the allegation the more cogent is the evidence required to overcome the unlikelihood of what is alleged and thus ......
-
Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation
...not excludingthe ordinary presumption of innocence and must determine the question according to the balance ofthose probabilities’.46 [1964] 1 All ER 771, 773.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 62176 ßThe Modern Law Review Limited serious events are said to be less probable.47 In terms of conceptu......
Request a trial to view additional results