Lock v Pearce
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1893 |
| Year | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd
...is given the right to apply to the Court for relief". He cited, as an example of this "common-sense interpretation", the early decision ( Lock v Pearce [1893] 2 Ch 271) that "although its language pointed in the opposite direction" the section did not require the notice to claim compensati......
-
Billson and Others v Residential Apartments Ltd
...In the latter case, one would expect prompt reaction by the tenant … The English cases relied on … [ Rogers v. Rice [1892] 2 Ch. 170; Locke v. Pearce [1893] 2 Ch. 271 and Quilter v. Mapleson (1882) 9 Q.B.D. 672] are distinguishable, if need be … by the fact … that they relate to re-entry ......
-
Bridgers and Another v Stanford
...landlord himself did not require it. A provision could be waived by the party for whose benefit it was introduced see: Lock v PearceELR ([1893] 2 Ch 271). The stipulation was for the benefit of the landlord alone and could be waived by him without the tenant's consent. Adopting the approach......
-
Bridgers (a Company With Unlimited Liability) and Another v Clive Austin Norman Stanford
...inserts the word "not" before the word "waive". 22 Further support for the first way of putting the landlord's case is to be found in Lock v. Pearce [1893] 2 Ch. 271. There the question turned on section 14(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1881, now replaced by section 146(1) of the Law of Proper......
Request a trial to view additional results