London and Blackwall Railway Company v Cross
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1885 |
| Date | 1885 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
- Pentadbir Tanah dan Daerah Melaka Tengah; Saonah bte Bedul
- Associated Tractors Sdn Bhd v Chan Boon Heng and Another
-
AB v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta,
...or which cannot be cured, usually because one party cannot collect damages from the other”). [83] London and Blackwall Railway v. Cross, 31 Ch. D. 354, 369 (C.A. 1886) per Lindley, L.J. (“The very first principle of injunction law is that primâ facie you do not obtain injunctions to restrai......
-
Priyanka Shipping Ltd v Glory Bulk Carriers Pte Ltd
...that an injunction will ordinarily not be granted where damages are an adequate remedy: as Lindley LJ said in London and Blackwall Railway Co. v Cross (1886) 31 Ch. D. 354, 369 (a case not cited to me, but which is well-known): “The very first principle of injunction law is that prima facie......
Request a trial to view additional results