Lord Advocate v Walker Trustees
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1912 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Dayani v Bromley London Borough Council
-
Joseph Dayani (Plaintiff) v London Borough of Bromley
...construing the statutes of Marlborough and Gloucester are contained in the following statements: 85 In Lord Advocate v. Walker Trustees [1912] A.C. 95, 102, Lord Atkinson said this: In Hebbert v. Purchas (1871) L.R. 3 P.C. 605, at p. 650 Lord Hatherley is reported to have said: "It is quite......
-
De Stackpoole
... ... Priestly , [1901] A. C. 208 , and Lord Advocate v. Mackenzie's TrusteesUNK , 42 S. L. R. 584, considered ... Walker's argument. It is defined as to "compendiously include." Two alternative ... Mackenzie's Trustees (1) ... Although we are not, strictly speaking, bound by that decision, or ... ...