Lord Sudeley v Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1896
Year1896
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Marley et Al v Mutual Security Merchant Bank & Trust Company Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 April 1989
    ...the authoritative position on this breach of law. It reads: “In their Lordship's opinion the decision of the Sudeley case [1897] A.C. 11; 12 T.L.R. 224; H.L. (E)., is conclusive on this issue. It is sufficient to quote the words of Lord Hershell, which do no more than reflect the reasoning ......
  • Re Maye
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 February 2008
    ...duty …" The widow's interest in her deceased husband's unadministered estate had been described by Lopes LJ in the Court of Appeal [1896] 1 QB 354 at 363 as "…an English chose in action, recoverable in England and [as]…an English and not a foreign asset, and as such…subject to probate duty......
  • Armstrong v Hinds
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 12 November 2010
    ...a right to enter into possession of the land or, in the case of rent charges, to distrain for arrears of rent;”. 32 In A.G. v. Sudeley ([1896] 1 Q.B. 354 (C.A.) at p. 359), Lord Esher M.R. explained that: “What is called a “right of action” is not the power of bringing an action. Anybody ca......
  • Dywidag Systems International Canada Ltd. v. Zutphen Brothers Construction Ltd., (1987) 76 N.S.R.(2d) 398 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 27 January 1987
    ...v. Motor Transport Bd. (1985), 36 Man.R.(2d) 81; 22 D.L.R.(4th) 520 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Attorney General v. Lord Sudeley, [1896] 1 Q.B. 354, refd to. [para. 13]. Singh et al. v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177; 58 N.R. 1, refd to. [para. 16]. Reference Re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • THE LAW'S REMEDIAL NORMS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...and D themselves, ie, they are not merely the obtaining by P or D from the court an order for disclosure. 66 Attorney General v Sudeley (1896) 1 QB 354 at 359, per Lord Esher. 67 Cf Benjamin C Zipursky, “Philosophy of Private Law” in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of La......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT