Louis Dreyfus & Cie v Parnaso Cia. Naviera S.A.

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1959
Date1959
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Agostino Bertani, Cape Rodney, Queen City, Riverton)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 Marzo 1961
    ... ... Harman in particular at page 59 in ( Louis Dreyfus v. Parnaso Cia Naviera 1960 2 Queen's ... ...
  • Hughes v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 Noviembre 1989
    ...the maxim that a thing is known by its neighbours (compare the judgment of Diplock J. in Louis Drefus et Cie v. Parnaso Cia Naviera S.A. [1959] 1 QB 498 at p.515, reversed on other grounds [1960] 2 QB 49. 48 Mr. Read says that a distinction is to be drawn by reason of the additional defin......
  • Mopani Copper Mines Plc v Millennium Underwriting Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 Junio 2008
    ...because it can be labelled “commercial”. 107 In the same year, in Louis Dreyfus & Cie v Parnaso Cia Naviera S.A. “The Dominator” [1959] 1 Q.B. 498, 513, Diplock, J, as he then was, decided that it was unreal to suppose that when contracting parties struck out from a standard form of words f......
  • Punjab National Bank v de Boinville
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 Mayo 1991
    ...the Bank. 42 The law on this topic still contains what Diplock J. described in Louis Dreyfus & Cie v. Parnaso Cia. Naviera S.A. [1959] 1 Q.B. 498, as "a pleasant diversity of authority…which the curious can find conveniently listed in a note in Scrutton on Charterparties…" (p. 409). Scrutto......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...with Agnew-Surpass Shoe Stores Ltd v Cummer-Yonge Investments Ltd , [1976] 2 SCR 221. 92 Louis Dreyfus & Cie v Paranos Cia Naviera SA , [1959] 1 QB 498 at 513. And see St Lawrence Cement Inc v Wakeman & Sons Ltd (1995), 26 OR (3d) 321 at 337 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1998] SCCA......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT