Love v Bell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1883 |
| Date | 1883 |
| Court | House of Lords (England) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Rudd v Rea
... ... of the respective rights of the owner of the soil and the owner of mineral rights, they cannot, I think, be reconciled with the decisions in Love v.Bell (6) , Hext v. Gill (5) , or Butterknowle Colliery Co. v. Bishop Auckland Industrial Co-operative Co. (7) —two of them decisions of the ... ...
-
Rudd v Rea
... ... of the respective rights of the owner of the soil and the owner of mineral rights, they could not, I think, be reconciled with the decisions in Love v. Bell (2) , Hext v. Gill (1) , or Butterknowle Colliery Co. v. Bishop Auckland Industrial Co-Operative Co. (3.) , two of them decisions of the ... ...
-
William Hilton against The Right Honourable Granville, Earl Granville
...Ch. 716; Buchanan v. Andrews, 1873, L. R. 2 H. L. (Sc.) 297; Hall v. Byron, 1877, 4 Ch. D. 677; Bell v. Love, 1883-84, 10 Q. B. D. 568; 9 App. Cas. 286. [701] william hilton against the eight honourable granville, earl gran-VILLE. Saturday, February 10th, 1845. To a declaration in case for ......
-
Anderson v M'Cracken Brothers
...App. 394; Smith v. DarbyELR, 1872, L. R., 7 Q. B. 716; Davis v. TreharneELR, 1881, L. R., 6 App. Cas. 460; Love v. BellELR, 1884, L. R., 9 App. Cas. 286; Greenwell Low Beechburn Coal Co.ELR, L. R. [1897], 2 Q. B. with which, if they required special powers, they ought to have stipulated for......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Minerals and Timber
...reviewed. The whole issue was discussed in detail in Wakefield v Duke of 25 Townley v Gibson (1788) 2 TR 701, 100 ER 377. 26 (1883–84) LR 9 App Cas 286. 27 [1906] AC 305. Buccleugh 28 where, exceptionally, there were held to be clear and wide words permitting subsidence although subject to ......
-
Table of Cases
...209, 78 ER 466 8.4, 9.4 Lonsdale (Earl of) v A-G [1982] 1 WLR 887, [1982] 3 All ER 579, (1983) 45 P&CR 1 11.5 Love v Bell (1883–84) LR 9 App Cas 286, 53 LJQB 257, 51 LT 1, HL 11.6 Lowe’s Case (Sir Anthony) (1610) 9 Co Rep 122b, 77 ER 909 18.1, 20.10, 22.5 Lowe’s Will Trust, Re; More v Att-G......