Lubrizol Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd
...feature of claim 1 is ambiguous, and hence the Patent is insufficient. 98 A similar issue arose in Lubrizol Corp v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1998] RPC 727. In that case one feature of claim 1 required the polyalkene (in the embodiments which mattered, a polyisobutene or PIB) to have an Mn (num......
-
H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)
...295. Aldous J had appeared to suggest that s.64 provided a general licence under the patent. On appeal in Lubrizol Corp. v Esso Petroleum [1998] RPC 727 at page 770, Aldous LJ explained the approach as follows: "It seems that the words used by me in Helitune have been read in a way not inte......
- Ranbaxy (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v El Du Pont De Nemours and Company
-
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v Warner Lambert Company
...& SMITH LTD 1982 RPC 183 GENERAL TYRE & RUBBER CO LTD v FIRESTONE TYRE & RUBBER CO LTD 1972 RPC 457 LUBRIZOL CORP v ESSO PETROLEUM CO LTD 1998 RPC 727 TICKNER v HONDA MOTOR CO LTD UNREP 2002 EWHC 8 (PATS) SOCIETE TECHNIQUE DE PULVERISATION (STEP) v EMSON EUROPE LTD 1993 RPC 513 IMPROVER COR......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...necessary to specify the attributes of such a person in a given case. This is because, as Aldous LJ explained in Lubrizol v Esso Petroleum[1998] RPC 727 at 738: [T]he court must adopt the mantle of the notional skilled addressee and determine, from the language used, what the notional skill......
