Lucy v Bawden
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
| Date | 1914 |
| Year | 1914 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
- Nippon Yusen Kaisha v WA Balch
-
Liverpool City Council v Irwin
... ... For my part I have much sympathy with the comments of Mr. Justice Atkin (as he then was) in Lucy v. Bawden (1914) 1 K.B. 318 at 325 , quoted by Mr. Justice Lush at page 799 of the report in Duster v. Hollis ... when he stated his difficulty in ... ...
-
London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
...to possess ought, in the opinion of an ordinarily careful invitor, to be warned of it. The words of Mr. Justice Atkin (as he then was) in Lucy v. Bawden [1914] 2 K.B. 318 at p. 326, approved by your Lordships' House in Fairman v. Perpetual Investment Building Society [1923] A.C. at p. 81, ......
-
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council, C.A.
...referred us to such cases as Hargroves & Co. V. Hartopp, 1905, 1 King's Bench, 472, Huggett V. Miers, 1908, 2 Kings Bench page 278, Lucy V. Bawden 1914, 2 Kings Bench page 318, Dunster V. Hollis, 1918 2 Kings Bench page 795, and Cockburn V. Smith, 1924 2 Kings Bench page 119, and sever......
Get Started for Free
