Lucy v Bawden
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1914 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
- Nippon Yusen Kaisha v WA Balch
-
London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
...to possess ought, in the opinion of an ordinarily careful invitor, to be warned of it. The words of Mr. Justice Atkin (as he then was) in Lucy v. Bawden [1914] 2 K.B. 318 at p. 326, approved by your Lordships' House in Fairman v. Perpetual Investment Building Society [1923] A.C. at p. 81, ......
-
Liverpool City Council v Irwin
...clearly found the state of the law obscure. For my part I have much sympathy with the comments of Mr. Justice Atkin (as he then was) in Lucy v. Bawden (1914) 1 K.B. 318 at 325, quoted by Mr. Justice Lush at page 799 of the report in Duster v. Hollis. when he stated his difficulty in followi......
-
Sleafer v Lambeth Borough Council, C.A.
...He referred us to such cases as Hargroves & Co. V. Hartopp, 1905, 1 King's Bench, 472, Huggett V. Miers, 1908, 2 Kings Bench page 278, Lucy V. Bawden 1914, 2 Kings Bench page 318, Dunster V. Hollis, 1918 2 Kings Bench page 795, and Cockburn V. Smith, 1924 2 Kings Bench page 119, and severa......
Request a trial to view additional results