Luscombe v Roberts, (1962)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1962 |
| Year | 1962 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Moore Stephens (A Firm) v Stone Rolls Ltd ((in Liquidation))
...AC 705. London and General Bank, ReELR [1895] 2 Ch 166. London and General Bank, Re (No. 2)ELR [1895] 2 Ch 673 (CA). Luscombe v Roberts (1962) 106 SJ 373. McNicholas Construction Co Ltd v C & E CommrsUNK [2000] STC 553. Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SAELR [1998] AC 20. ......
-
Singularis Holdings Ltd (in Official Liquidation) (a Company Incorporated in the Cayman Islands) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd
...does not cause the loss. 37 Second, Daiwa argues that the law should not treat a company more favourably than an individual. In Luscombe v Roberts (1962) 106 SJ 373, a solicitor's claim against his negligent accountants failed because he knew that what he was doing — transferring money fro......
-
Stone and Rolls Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Moore Stephens (A Firm)
...duty of care towards me? Plainly not. There could hardly be a more obvious application of the ex turpi causa principle to bar my claim. Luscombe v Roberts (1962) 106 SJ 373 illustrates the point. Suppose then I am bankrupted. Can my trustee in bankruptcy bring the claim for the benefit of ......
-
The Law Society v Kpmg Peat Marwick (Sued as Kpmg Peat Marwick McLintock) and Others
...had been dishonest ones. No-one can be allowed to base a cause of action on his own dishonesty (see Luscombe Roberts and Pascho (1962) 106 SJ 373) . But the breach of duty could be sued on if the solicitor were merely negligent and, even if he were dishonest, could be sued on by innocent pa......