Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2007 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
NGPOD Global Ltd v Aspirate N Go Ltd
...to be treated differently, so I can apply the same test throughout. 9 Guidance on the application of that provision is given in Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Ltd [2007] RPC 33 (Warren J). The nature of the central question for the court on an application under the subsection was identified......
-
Energenics Pte Ltd v Musse Singapore Pte Ltd and another suit
...a s 20(1)(a) question. In this regard, the High Court of England and Wales held, in Luxim Corp v Ceravision Ltd [2007] EWHC 1624; [2007] RPC 33 (“Luxim Corp”), that the scheme of s 8 of the UK Patents Act (with which s 20(1) of the Patents Act is in pari materia) is such that questions are ......
-
NGPOD Global Ltd v Aspirate N Go Ltd
...to be treated differently, so I can apply the same test throughout. 9 Guidance on the application of that provision is given in Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Ltd [2007] RPC 33 (Warren J). The nature of the central question for the court on an application under the subsection was identified......
-
Decision Nº O/144/15 from Intellectual Property Office - (Patent decisions), 2 April 2015
...that that the case remains with the comptroller unless it appears to 8 Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Limited [2007] EWHC 1624 (Ch), [2007] RPC 33 him that the question (or the matter involved) is more proper to be determined by the court. 43 The comptroller had hitherto declined to deal on......
Request a trial to view additional results