Lyle-Samuel v Odhams Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1920
Year1920
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Janet Jagan and Another v Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Burke v Central Independent Television Plc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1994
    ...3) [1994] 1 I.L.R.M. 364. Gormley v. Ireland [1993] 2 I.R. 75. In re Kevin O'Kelly (1974) 108 I.L.T.R. 97. Lyle-Samuel v. Odhams Ltd. [1920] 1 K.B. 135. McDonagh v. News Group Newspapers Ltd. (Unreported, Supreme Court, 23rd November, 1993). McGuinness v. Attorney General of Victoria (1940)......
  • British Steel Corporation v Granada Television Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 Julio 1980
    ...the privilege of not having to answer such interrogatories might be raised in matters interesting to a number of the public. In Lyle-Samuel v. Odhams Ltd. [1920] 1 K.B. 135 Blankes L.J. referred to these observations of Buckley L.J. and said that it was not necessary to discuss the rule or......
  • Eastweek Publisher Ltd. v John Sham
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 7 Julio 1994
    ...libel is founded will not, as a rule, be allowed (Plymouth Mutual Society v Traders' Association [1906]1 KB 403, Lyle-Samuel v Odhams Ltd [1920]1 KB 135, CA; South Suburban Co-operative Society v Orum [1937]2 KB 690; Lawson v Odhams Press [1949]1 KB 129, CA) especially when there is a reaso......
  • Get Started for Free