M'Allisters v Sprot. [Court of Session—2d Division.]
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Judge | Lord Medwyn. B. |
| Judgment Date | 17 November 1825 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - Second Division) |
| Date | 17 November 1825 |
| Docket Number | No. 162. |
Lord Medwyn. B.
6. Geo. IV. c. 120.—
Several reclaiming notes, under the new form of process, were moved for the first time. Some of them contained a detailed narrative of the case, and of the procedure in the Inferior Court; some entered into argument on the cause; and others, against judgments in the Bill-Chamber, had bills of advocation and suspension, or other documents, attached as appendices. All these the Court ordered to be withdrawn as irregular, reserving to the parties to present other notes in proper form.
The Court stated that these notes ought merely to state the general nature of the case with the utmost possible brevity,—to recite the interlocutors of the Lord Ordinary reclaimed against, but not those in the Inferior Court,—and to crave an alteration; and that representations and other papers, including the summons and defences required by the A. S. to be boxed, ought to be so, along with and attached to the note.
Form of reclaiming notes under the new Judicature Act.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Osei v Southwark LBC
...ceases to occupy accommodation which is available for his occupation and which it would have been reasonable for him to continue to occupy.” 4. S 191 (1) contains four requirements. First, the applicant for housing must have deliberately acted or omitted to act. S 191(2) goes on to provide ......