M v Advocate (HM)
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Year | 1974 |
| Date | 1974 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Rr, Petitioner
...SLT 634; 2018 SCCR 189 Lang, Petr 1991 SLT 931; 1991 SCCR 138 Lloyds and Scottish Finance Ltd v HM Advocate 1974 JC 24; 1974 SLT 3; [1975] Crim LR 108 M v HM Advocate (No 2) sub nom CJM v HM Advocate [2013] HCJAC 22; 2013 SLT 380; 2013 SCCR 215; 2013 SCL 361 Marks and Spencer plc v Customs ......
-
Pullar v HM Advocate
...should, however, be no questioning of the jury in order to find out whether or not any of them should be excused: M. v. H.M. Advocate 1974 S.L.T. (Notes) 25. If the trial judge thinks it desirable to do so, therefore, he should simply ask them, or tell them, to let the court know if they th......
-
Stuurman v H. M. Advocate
...J., stressed that the case was unique and that this course would set no precedent. It is sufficient to refer to M. v. H. M. Advocate 1974 S.L.T. (Notes) 25. No such questioning would be allowed in Scotland. In the end of the day the argument for the third and fourth accused was to the effec......
-
R. v. Hubbert, (1977) 15 N.R. 139 (SCC)
...(1964), 48 Cr. App. Rep. 143, refd to. [Appendix]. R. v. Broderick, [1970] Crim. L.R. 155, refd to. [Appendix]. M. v. H.M. Advocate, [1975] Crim. L.R. 108, refd to. [Appendix]. R. v. Chasson (1876), 16 N.B.R. 546, refd to. [Appendix]. R. v. Mah Hung (1912), 20 C.C.C. 40 (B.C., C.A.), refd t......