M. v M. (Child: Access)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1973 |
| Year | 1973 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
63 cases
-
Re W (A Minor) (Residence Order)
...would not I think be inappropriate to describe such a claim as a 'right'. Equally, a normal assumption is, as Latey J observed in M v M [1973] 2 All ER 81 that a child will benefit from continued contact with his natural parent. But both the`right' and the assumption will always be displace......
-
Re Murphy
...In re, [1977] 1 W.L.R. 533; [1977] 2 AH E.R. 737; (1976), 7 Fam. Law 82, dictum of Latey J. applied. (4) M. v. M. (Child: Access), [1973] 2 All E.R. 81, applied. (5) S. (Infants) (Adoption by Parent), In re, [1977] Fam. 173; [1977] 3 All E.R. 671; (1977), 121 Sol. Jo. 222; 7 Fam. Law 238, c......
-
AH v JH
...the child which is normally in the child's best interest, such access would not be granted if it was not in the welfare of the child. M v M (Child: Access) 1973 2 All ER 81. Given the submission that molestation had occurred, access it was submitted was not in JEH's welfare and in fact migh......
-
Re W (Children)
...(Access) [1992] 1 FCR 70 at p 73 Balcombe, LJ quoted, endorsing as fully as he could, an earlier passage in a judgment of Latey, J in M v M (Child: Access) [1973] 2 All ER 81 where that Judge had said at p 89F-H: "…where the parents have separated and one has the care of the child, access b......
Request a trial to view additional results