Macaulay v Macaulay

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Date1991
Year1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • D.T v F.L
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 22 February 2006
    ...(EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON JURISDICTION & ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL & COMMERCIAL MATTERS) 1968 ART 27(4) MACAULEY v MACAULEY 1991 1 WLR 179 1991 1 AER 865 1991 FCR 483 CONSTITUTION ART 41 EEC REG 44/01 ART 5(2) EEC REG 44/01 ART 1(2)(a) BRUSSELS CONVENTION (EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON JURIS......
  • R v West London Magistrates' Court, ex parte Emmett
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Rules 1977, r 67(1). Cases referred to in judgment: Hoffman v Krieg (Case 145/86); [1988] ECR 645. Macaulay v Macaulay [1991] FCR 483; [1991] 1 WLR 179; [1991] 1 All ER 865. John Waters for the husband. Robin Spon-Smith for the wife. MR JUSTICE WARD.This is an appeal by way of case stated a......
  • Y (M) v Y (A)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 December 1995
    ...UNREP MACKENZIE 29.7.87 1988/6/1568 M (C) V M (T) 1987 IR 152 M (C) V M (T) 1988 ILRM 456 WOOD V WOOD 1957 P 254 MACAULEY V MACAULEY 1991 1 WLR 179 ESTIN V ESTIN 334 US 541 MARRIED WOMENS STATUS ACT 1957 S12 PARTITION ACTS 1868 – 1876 CONSTITUTION ART 40 1 Judgment delivered on the 11th da......
  • Woodfab Ltd v Coillte Teo
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 August 1995
    ...1987 P1573 C.M. v. T.M. 1987 IR 152 C.M. v. T.M. 1988 ILRM 456 C.M. v. T.M. 1991 ILRM 267 Wood v. Wood 1957 P 254 MacAuley v. MacAuley 1991 1 WLR 179 E.D. v. F.D. Costello J. unreported 23rd October, 1980 P1891 Estin v. Estin 334 VS 541 44Doc. No. ...
  • Get Started for Free