MacCarthy v Agard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1933
Date1933
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Pearlman (Veneers) S.A. (Pty.) Ltd v Bernhard Bartels
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 23 November 1954
    ...these Courts have no jurisdiction to amend a Judgment once it has been entered. Reliance was placed on the decision of this Court in MacCarthy v. Agard, 1933, 2 King's Bench, page 417. The distinction between that case and the present was drawn by MrJustice Slade in a Judgment with which I ......
  • Thynne v Thynne
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 27 July 1955
    ...these courts have no Jurisdiction to amend a judgment once it has been entered. Beliance was placed on the decision of this court in MaoOarthy v. Agard. The distinction between that case and the present was drawn by Mr. Justice Slade in a judgment with whidh I fully agree. In MaoOarthy v. A......
  • Ang Chee Seng v Tan Khee Swee
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1935
  • Owners of Steamship Enterprises of Panama Inc. v Owners of SS Ousel (The Liverpool) (Form of Decree)
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1985. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    .........117 LyeII v. Kennedy (1882) 20 Ch.D. 484 at 490. ......323 M.O. Obisanya v. Nwoko, (1974) 6 S.C. 69 ......117 Macarthy v. Agard (1933) 2 K.B. 417. ......245 Macaulay v. Tukuru (1881-1911) 1 N.L.R. 36 at 37. ......473 Maclean v. Workers' Union (1929) 1 Ch. 602, 625. 689 CASES REFERRED ......
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1967 Preliminary Sections
    • 12 November 2022
    ...P. 123; 44 T.L.R. 299. 46 Mabro v. Eagle Star & British Dominions Insurance Co. Ltd. (1932) All E.R. Rep. 411 200 Macarthy v. Agard [1933] 2 K.B. 417; 102 L.J.K.B. 753. 82 Majiyagbe v. Attorney General & Ors (1957) N.N.L.R. 158. 167 Mawe v. Piggott (1889) 1 R. 4 C.L. 54, referred to and quo......
  • Cases referred to in 1967
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1967 Preliminary Sections
    • 12 November 2022
    ...P. 123; 44 T.L.R. 299. 46 Mabro v. Eagle Star & British Dominions Insurance Co. Ltd. (1932) All E.R. Rep. 411 200 Macarthy v. Agard [1933] 2 K.B. 417; 102 L.J.K.B. 753. 82 Majiyagbe v. Attorney General & Ors (1957) N.N.L.R. 158. 167 Mawe v. Piggott (1889) 1 R. 4 C.L. 54, referred to and quo......
  • ASIYANBI & ORS. V. ADENIJI
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1967 Cases reported in 1967
    • 12 November 2022
    ...CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 1. Preston Banking Co. v. William Allsup & Sons [1895] 1 Ch. 141; 64 L.J. Ch. 196. 2. Macarthy v. Agard [1933] 2 K.B. 417; 102 L.J.K.B. 753. 50 3. Thynne (Marchioness of Bath) v. Thynne (Marquess of Bath) (1955) 3 All E.R. 129, 146; [1955] P.272; [1955] 3 W.L.......
  • Get Started for Free