Mackay Appellant; Dick and another Respondents
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1875 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
144 cases
-
Meridian Communications Ltd v Eircell Ltd
...Liverpool C. C. v. Irwin [1977] A.C. 239; [1976] Q.B. 319; [1976] 2 W.L.R. 562; [1976] 2 All E.R. 39. Mackay v. Dick and Stevenson (1881) 6 App. Cas. 251. Mayfield Holdings Ltd. v. Moana Reef Ltd. [1973] 1 N.Z.L.R. 309. Massarella v. Massarella (Unreported, High Court, Keane J., 10th July, ......
-
Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation P.L.C.
...willing to imply into a contract a term prohibiting one party from “ preventing” the performance of another (see e.g. Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251), we accept Mr Howard's submission that there is no general rule that such a term will be implied. Where there is some agreed precondition......
-
UTB LLC v Sheffield United Ltd
...not seek to prevent B from performing and may be obliged to take any steps that he can take to enable B to perform: see Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251, 263. That is uncontroversial, but I cannot see to what issue in this case such an obligation is relevant. It may be that it was at one ......
-
Geys v Societe Generale, London Branch
...have never applied to contracts of employment the doctrine of deemed performance endorsed by the House of Lords in Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251, according to which a party who is prevented by the non-co-operation of the counterparty from satisfying a condition precedent to his right t......
Request a trial to view additional results