Maclurcan v Maclurcan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1897
Date1897
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Mountney v Treharne
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 August 2002
    ...her favour. 29 In support of this submission Mr Morgan cites a line of English authority, starting with a decision of this court in Maclurcan v. Maclurcan (1897) 77 LT 474 , to the effect that an order for periodical payments to be secured on identified property, with provision for the sec......
  • DW (First Appellant) CW (Second Appellant) v CG
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 21 November 2016
    ...support. In that case it was decided that a transfer of property order gave the wife an equitable interest applying, what is called, the Maclurcan line of authority after the case of Maclurcan v Maclurcan (1897) 77 LT 474. In Maclurcan it was decided that an order directing the provision of......
  • Hill and another v Haines
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 December 2007
    ...at an undervalue and preferences).” 7 This provision does not sit comfortably with the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Maclurcan v Maclurcan (1897) 77 LT 474 and Mountney v Treharne [2003] Ch.135 to the effect that it is the order of the court exercising the matrimonial jurisdiction whi......
  • Treharne & Sand v Forrester
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 4 November 2003
    ...many authorities that were cited in the case but at page 156 f Jonathan Parker LJ stated: "It follows that, applying Maclurcan v. Maclurcan 77 LT 474, my decision in Beer v. Higham (A Bankrupt) [1997] BPIR 349 was wrong. The same applies, in my judgment, to the observations of Butler-Sloss ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 July 2022
    ...Potzus v Potzus, 2018 SKQB 55. 205 Hyde v Hyde, [1948] P 198. 206 Barker v Barker, [1952] P 184 (Eng CA). 207 Maclurcan v Maclurcan (1897), 77 LT 474 (Eng CA); Mosey v Mosey, [1956] P 26; Richardson’s Will Trusts v Llewellyn-Evans’ Trustees, [1958] Ch 208 F v F, [1967] 2 All ER 660. 209 Swi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT