Madrassa Anjuman Islamia v Johannesburg Municipal Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1922 |
| Date | 1922 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Stevens v Bromley London Borough Council
...by the learned trial judge from the speech of Viscount Cave in Madrasse Anguman Islamia of Kholwad v. Johannesburg Municipal Council (1922 1 AC 500, at 504). As to the term "occupier", the learned Lord concluded, "Its precise meaning in any particular statute or document must depend on the ......
-
Principal and Fellows of Newnham College v HM Revenue and Customs
...that this is a word which can mean different things in different contexts: see, for example, Viscount Cave in Madrassa Anjuman Islamia v Johannesburg Municipal Council [1922] 1 AC 500, 504 ("a word of uncertain meaning") and Lord Mustill in Southern Water Authority v Nature Conservancy Cou......
-
Southern Water Authority v Nature Conservancy Council
...for they draw their meaning entirely from the purpose for which and the context in which they are used: see Madrassa Anjuman Isalmia of Kholwad v. Municipal Council of Johannesburg [1922] 1 A.C. 500, per Lord Cave at page 504. Indeed the Act itself demonstrates that the word "occupier" has......
-
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs v Feakins and another
...purpose to be achieved in relation to the non-Garron animals. I was referred to the case of Kholwad v. Municipal Council of Johannesburg [1922] 1 AC 500 as an example of the court applying such a construction. Mr Harris on behalf of Defra developed this argument in powerful written closing ......
Request a trial to view additional results