Mahon v Sims

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date08 June 2005
Date08 June 2005
CourtQueen's Bench Division

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

Before Mr Justice Hart

Mahon and Another
and
Sims and Another

Land - restrictive covenant - 'transferors' includes successors in title - implied term that consent should not be unreasonably withheld

Successors must not unreasonably withhold consent

Where a transfer of land contained a restrictive covenant whereby the transferees covenanted with the transferors not to erect any building on the land other than a greenhouse, shed or garage, in accordance with plans approved by the transferors, the meaning of "the transferors" included their successors in title.

Moreover, a term should be implied into the covenant that any approval of plans should not be unreasonably withheld.

Mr Justice Hart, sitting as a judge of the Queen's Bench Division in the Birmingham District Registry, so held in allowing in part the appeal of the defendants, Robert Fraser Sims and Joan Margaret Sims, against the order of Judge Kirkham following the trial of preliminary issues in an action between owners of neighbouring houses, brought by the claimants, Christopher Leslie Mahon and Rosemary Jacklyn Pietrzykowski, to enforce the terms of a restrictive covenant made between the claimants' predecessors in title (Mr and Mrs Houghton) and the defendants' predecessors in title (Mr and Mrs Martin) to a piece of garden land.

The transfer of the garden contained a restrictive covenant by which the transferees (Mr and Mrs Houghton) covenanted with the transferors (Mr and Mrs Martin) to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Churchill v Temple
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • October 22, 2010
    ...it was clear from the covenant that the draftsman referred to the vendor's heirs when that was what was intended. 20 In Mahon v. Sims [2005] 3 E.G.L.R. 67, Hart J. had to consider the following covenant:— "The Transferees hereby jointly and severally covenant with the Transferors to the int......
  • Margerison v Bates
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • May 30, 2008
    ...title” wherever he thought it appropriate. 41 Mr Newsom draws my attention, in support of his submissions, to the decision of Hart J in Mahon –v- Sims [2005] 3 EGLR 67. This was an appeal from Her Honour Judge Kirkham sitting in the Birmingham County Court. But Mahon had a fundamental diffe......
  • Dennis and Others v Davies
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • October 22, 2009
    ...the other occupiers of the estate. In support of the first of those assertions, Mr Weekes invoked the decision of Hart J in Mahon and another v. Sims and another [2005] 3 EGLR 67. In support of the second, he referred to Land Covenants, Scammell, 1996, page 239, where the author suggested t......
  • City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 6, 2008
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Preliminary Sections
    • August 30, 2016
    ...v Childers (1889) 43 Ch D 265, ChD 258 Macpherson v Scottish Rights of Way and Recreation Society (1888) 13 App Cas 744 150 Mahon v Sims [2005] 3 EGLR 67, [2005] 39 EG 138, QBD 277 Maidstone Borough Council v Mortimer [1980] 3 All ER 552, [1981] JPL 112, (1982) 43 P & CR 67, DC 530 Mail......
  • Meaning and Construction of Certain Restrictive Covenants which Impact on the Development and Commercial Use of Land
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • August 30, 2016
    ...a chance ‘it will require very strong circumstances where, if the chance having been taken and lost, an injunction will be withheld’. 12 [2005] 39 EG 138. 278 Restrictions on the Use of Land Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd , 13 the court found that a covenant by the transferee of land not to d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT