Mahoney v Purnell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Gamatronic (UK) Ltd and Another v Robert Hamilton and Another
...in exchange for a sum of money, that is the transaction which has to be reversed. 217 The second authority relied upon is Mahoney v Purnell [1996] 3 All ER 61. There the parties to a share transaction could not be restored to their original position because the company had gone into liquida......
- Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
-
AB Jnr v MB
...3 DLR 465 considered. (14) Longstaff v. Birtles, [2002] 1 W.L.R. 470; [2001] EWCA Civ 1219, considered. (15) Mahoney v. Purnell, [1996] 3 All E.R. 61; [1997] 1 FLR 612; [1997] Fam. Law 169, referred to. (16) Marley v. Mutual Sec. Merchant Bank & Trust Co. Ltd., [1991] 3 All E.R. 198, referr......
-
Rashpal Samrai v Rajinder Kalia
...the relief that may be granted. Support for a jurisdiction to order an undue influencer to pay compensation further come from Mahoney v Purnell [1996] 3 All E.R. 61 per May J where the Defendant no longer held the right transferred in the impugned transaction, nor did the Defendant retain t......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Duress, Undue Influence, and Unconscionability
...an earlier authority in which the availability of such relief was assumed, see Treadwell v Martin (1976), 67 DLR (3d) 493 (NBCA). 216 [1996] 3 All ER 61 (QB) [ Mahoney ]. 217 See generally Maddaugh & McCamus, above note 7, ch 2. See also J D McCamus, An Introduction to the Canadian Law of R......
-
Restitution and Disgorgement
...awards were not commonly made. See PM McDermott, “Jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery to Award Damages” (1992) 108 Law Q Rev 652. 130 [1996] 3 All ER 61 (QB). Restitution and Disgorgement 1171 of misrepresentation, 131 undue influence, 132 and unconscionability. 133 Support for the award......
