"Manilia"-(Barret)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 April 1808 |
| Date | 01 April 1808 |
| Court | High Court of Admiralty |
English Reports Citation: 165 E.R. 1011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY
Referred to, Republic of Peru v Dreyfus, 1888, 38 Ch D. 359, The "Gagara," [1919] P. 95
REPORTS of CASES ARGUED and DETERMINED in the HIGH COURT of ADMIRALTY, commencing with the JUDGMENTS of the Right Hon. SIR WILLIAM SCOTT. Easter Term 1808. By THOMAS EDWARDS, LL.D., Advocate. London, 1812. CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME, AND SINCE HEARD ON APPEAL. Before the Lords Commissioners of Appeal in Prize Causes. Arthur, Rathburn, January 26th 1811 ...... Affirmed. Comet, Mix, March 3d 1810 Affirmed. Elizabeth, Nowell, Jan 18th 1812 -Affirmed, and Appellant condemned in Costs. Europa, Sundberg, Jan 26th 1811 -Affirmed, and Appellants condemned in Costs. GuUhaume Tell, Sanmer, Feb. 1st 1810 ...... Affirmed. Johan, Abraham, July 7th 1810.-Affirmed, but Expenses of Claimant of Ship pronounced to be a charge on the Cargo Jonge Josias, Jurgensen, Feb. 9th 1811 . . . . . . Affirmed. Mentor, Williams, Jan 26th 1811 Affirmed. Progress, Barker, Jan 26th 1811 . . . . . . . Affirmed Rapid, Fleming, March 9th 1811 ....... Affirmed. Thorshaven, Jan. 26th 1811 Affirmed. Victoria, otherwise Alfred the Great, July 28th 1810 -Affirmed, and Appellant condemned in Costs Vrow Cornelw, Dykstra, June 13th 1811 . . . . ' i F2 A t fifi 1 [1] reports op cases argued and determined in the high court of admiralty " manilla "-(Barret). April 1, 1808.-Ports and places of St Domingo not in possession of the French, excepted out of the general character of the island as an enemy's colony since the Orders in Council recognised them as open to British trade. [Referred to, Republic of Peru v Dreyfus, 1888, 38 Ch D. 359 , The " Gagara," [1919J P. 95 ] This was a question arising on the construction of the fourth clause of the Order in Council of the llth of November 1807, as applied to those parts of St. Domingo, which had been wrested from the enemy by the insurgent negroes : the relaxation of the general prohibition to trade with the enemy contained in that clause being limited to the direct voyage between the enemy's colony and the country to which the neutral vessel belongs, or some free port in His Majesty's colonies For the captors, the King's Advocate and Arnold contended-That the question had already been disposed of by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the cases of The " Dart " and " Happy Couple" (Lords, 17th March 1808), in which it was held that notwithstanding the unsettled...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
[1] Halliwel Assets Inc. [2] Panikos Symeou [3] Marigold Trust Company Ltd Appellants/Defendants v Hornbeam Coproration Claimant Vadim Shulman Respondent
...at their power, or rather their duty, for power they had none, of dealing with costs. The Statute of Gloucester, which was passed in the 6th Edw. 1, is the foundation of the Common Law jurisdiction as to costs, and that statute bound the Common Law Judges, so that they could not in any way ......
-
O'Sullivan v Mount Juliet Properties Ltd
...13.6.2002 (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003) RECITAL 13 MIN FOR JUSTICE v MAZUREK UNREP EDWARDS 13.5.2011 2011 IEHC 204 AG v O'GARA UNREP EDWARDS 1.5.2012 2012 IEHC 179 MIKLIS v DEPUTY PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF LITHUANIA 2006 4 AER 808 EXTRADITION European Arrest Warrant Presumption - Decision ......
- Sovfracht (v/O) v Van Udens Scheepvaart en Agentuur Maatschappij (N.v.Gebr.)
- Miller v Bull & Others
-
Farewell John Edwards — We Know You All Too Well
...post-trial statement with his daughter and parents at his side and behind him made everyone wince. His declaration that God was not “finished...
-
A Growing Trend: Employee Non-Solicitation Provisions Are Under Attack in California and Elsewhere
.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Enforcement of Employee Non-Solicitation Provisions in California: Loral and Edwards . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 The Mounting Challenge to Loral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
-
The reality of evolving standards and the death penalty.
...that the number of aggravating factors were so numerous as to violate the narrowing requirement of the Cruel and Unusual Clause. By Daniel Edwards (1) (1) J.D. University of Colorado, 1976; Senior Assistant Attorney General, Violent Crimes Assistance Team; Special Deputy District Attorney i......
-
Have Your Cake and Eat It Too (Unless You Are Danny Brock): The Irony of Missouri's Co-Employee Liability Statute.
...trial and Peter Dunne was substituted as a defendant ad litem. (35) Brock claimed that Edwards negligently caused Brock's injuries when Edwards: (1) removed the safety guard from the machine; (2) ordered the machine to be cleaned while the machine was in operation and the guard was removed;......
-
Lesser Included Offences, Alternative Offences and Accessorial Liability
...Pilate: and OtherPapers and Addresses (Law Book Co.: Sydney, 1965) 61 at 65. At 63, Sir Owen Dixon argues that ‘the Statute of Gloucester (6Edw. 1 c. 9 [enacted in 1278)] . . . forms the foundation of the development of the law of excusable homicide.’ Coldironobserves, ‘Staundford should be......
-
In a Constitutional State: Magna Carta in New Zealand 1840-2015
...(CA) (Baragwanath J). 80 Magna Carta 1215 , Chapter 40 translated in J C Holt, above n 3, Appendix 6 at 389; Magna Carta 1297 , c 9, 25 Edw 1, c 29. 81 That was of course a civil case involving a will immured in Chancery for generations, and possibly based on real cases, one of which was th......
-
Bradford Corporation Act 1910
...to consume or burn its own smoke or if any person using or permitting to be used any C.4 39 [Oh. CXvii.] Bradford Corporation Ad, 1910. [lO EDW. 1-& 1 GrEO. 5.] I A.D. lyio. furnace so constructed shall in the event of the smoke . arising therefrom not being effectually consumed or burnt fa......
-
Tramways Orders Confirmation Act 1909
...Tramways.Order authorising the Urban District Council of the Urban District of Whitworth to construct tramways in their district. a1 ,^t f9 EdW. 1.] Tramways Orders Confirmation [Oh. CXliii.] ^tf,19Q9. BOLTON CORPORATION. o A.D. 1909. Order authorising the Mayor. Aldermen. and Burgesses of ......
-
Leyton Urban District Council Act 1904
...containing the advertisement shall be sufficient evidence that the provisions of this section have been complied with. 72 « • - • [4 EDW, 1.) teytdn tfrban district Qoimcil Act, 1904. [Oh. 131. Offences under this Part of this Act may be prosecuted A.D. 1904 and penalties may be recovered b......
-
Local Government Board's Provisional Orders Confirmation (No.6) Act 1910
...pink and yellow and green and blue on the two maps marked B which are sealed with the official 29 [Oh.lxXXiiiJ Jbocal GovernmentBoard's [IO'EDW. 1 & Provisional; Orders Confirmation (No, 6)-Act, 1910. 1 GEO. 5.] F A.D. 1910- seal of the Local Government Board and are herein-after referred t......