Mansell contra Middleton, in Mich
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1638 |
| Date | 01 January 1638 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 115
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
[34] Mansell contra Middleton, in Mich. 14 Car. [1638]. Penniman contra Jennings, lands given to churchwardens, void in law, decreed hereabout, 2 Car. [1626-27]. Pember contra Inhabitant de Kington, whether money given to maintain a preaching minister be a charitable use, the Lord Keeper and the judges did decree (notwithstanding it is not warranted by the statute to be a charitable use) that the same shall be paid by the executor to such maintenance, in Trin. 15 Car. [1639]. Pensterd contra Pavier, A. deviseth twenty pounds per annum, to a preaching minister, dies, leaving lands and assets, the defendant will not pay it accordingly, the Court with the judges chargeth her out of the assets, to buy lands to perpetuate it, in Trin. 15 Car. [1639], she having but a third part of the lands, and so ought not to be chargeable with any more. Bramble contra Pauperes de Havering, feme covert makes...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Robb and Reid v The Right Rev Bishop Dorrian
...Ha. 342. Nelson v. SmallUNK 13 Ir. C. L. R. 558. Grieves v. Case 1 Ves. J. 519. Thornber v. WilsonENR 3 Drew. 245. Pensterd v. PavierENR Tothill, 34. Pember v. Inhabitants de KingtonENR Nelson, 40. Joyce v. OsborneENR Tothill, 34. Partridge v. Strange Plowd. 88. Underwood v. Lord Courtown 2......
-
O'Hanlon v Logue
...R. 17. (3) I. R. 10 C. L. 104. (4) [1897] 2 I. R. 426. (1) I. R. 10 C. L. 104. (2) [1898] 1 I. R. at p. 446. (1) I. R. 10 C. L. 104. (2) Tothill, 34. (3) (4) Nelson, 40. (5) Amb. 201. (6) 1 Ves. Jun. 546. (7) 1 Keen, 803. (8) 3 Drew, 245. (9) I. R. 11 C. L. 292. (10) [1897] 2 I. R. 426, at ......