Maritime Transport Overseas GmbH v Unitramp SA (The Antaios)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Judgment Date1981
Date1981
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Barbury (Panama) SA and Another v Cross Oceanic Navigational Services Pte Ltd; The Enfield
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 28 Mayo 1982
    ...all material times the beneficial owner of the vessel: at [8]. Aventicum, The [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 184 (refd) Maritime Trader, The [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep 153 (refd) High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 6, 1970 Rev Ed)s 4 (4) (1) (a) (consd) Lo Kok Siong (Allen & Gledhill) for the appe......
  • The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd v Evdomon Corporation and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Companies Act 4th ed at 47; A Domanski (1986) SA Law Journal 224; The Aventicum [1978] 1 Lloyds Rep 184 at 187; The Maritime Trader [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep 153 at 157; Shaw Admiralty Jurisdiction and Practice in South J Africa at 36; Jackson v Parker 1950 (3) SA 25 (E); Rodwell Securities v Th......
  • Owners of the Vasso v Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Vasso (aka The Vasso) (aka The Andria) (Vasso)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Diciembre 1983
    ...Court for the purpose of hearing and determining any claim. Accordingly, on the basis of his own decision in The Maritime Trader (1981) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 153, in which he followed earlier decisions of Brandon J. (as he then was) in The Cap Bon (1967) 1 Lloyd's Rep. 543 and The Rena K (1979)......
  • Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG and Another and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 27 Abril 2009
    ...AC 774 at 807, PP v Lew Syn Pau [2006] 4 SLR 210, Macaura v Northern Assurance Company, Limited [1925] AC 619, The Maritime Trader [1981] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 153 and The Gramophone and Typewriter, Limited v Stanley [1908] 2 KB 89). The Judge was correct to hold that Beckkett had no standing to se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 Diciembre 1994
    ...See [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 184 at 187 right-hand column. 68 [1988] 1 W.L.R. 1090. 69 Ibid., at 1097. See also “The Maritime Trader”[1981] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 153 at 157 where Sheen J. said that the evidence which the plaintiffs had relied on to persuade the court to lift the corporate veil of the......
  • Charting Our Own Courses: The Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore Journeys in Maritime Law
    • Australia
    • Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal No. 30-1, June 2016
    • 1 Junio 2016
    ...Act; s 5(2)(b) Admiralty Act 1973 (NZ). 42 The Eschersheim [1976] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 1 43 The Eschersheim at 7.͒ 44 The Maritime Trader [1981] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 153 at 156. 45 Francesco Berlingieri, Berlingieri on Arrest of Ships : A Commentary on the 1952 and 1999 Arrest Conventions (Informa, 5 th ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT