Marks & Spencer Plc

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date23 November 1989
Date23 November 1989
CourtValue Added Tax Tribunal

VAT Tribunal

Marks & Spencer plc

The following cases were referred to in the decision:

Goodfellow & Steven Ltd VAT(1987) 3 BVC 1332; (EDN/87/10) No. 2453

Quaker Oats Ltd; C & E Commrs v VAT(1987) 3 BVC 119

Round (E) & Son Ltd VATUNK(1986) 2 BVC 208,094; (MAN/85/165) No. 2069

Assessment - Whether Caramel Shortcake Slices were standard-rated as biscuits, or zero-rated as cakes - Value Added Tax Act 1983 schedule 5 group 1Value Added Tax Act 1983, sec. 16, Sch. 5, Grp. 1 - Value Added Tax (Confectionery) Order 1988 No. 505.

The issue was whether the Caramel Shortcake Slices retailed by Marks and Spencer were standard or zero-rated.

The appellant contended that the Caramel Shortcake Slices (the product) was a cake and therefore zero-rated. Evidence was given for the appellant that the product was beaten in a conventional cake mixer and sold in slice form to fit in with the "cake slice range". The maximum shelf-life of a cake was 25 days, whereas biscuits would last significantly longer. In the trade the term "flour confectionery" or "baker's confectionery" included all kinds of cake, including shortcake, but not biscuits.

The product, presented in slices for convenience, could as easily be sold as a larger slab. It had a much shorter shelf-life than either "biscuits" or "confectionery". It was marketed as part of the appellant's range of cakes. All the cakes were displayed on a cake counter, whereas the biscuits were displayed by the savouries rather than next to the cakes. The average price per biscuit was between 2-4 pence whereas the product cost 17.8 pence per slice. The cake department sold cakes and bread only and not biscuits which had a longer shelf-life. The manufacturer of the product made only cakes and no biscuits. Biscuits had a harder texture.

The appellant contended that the main factors to be taken into consideration were the manufacturing process, the appearance and the marketing, and the objective test of what the man in the street would say should be adopted. The product had the ingredients of a cake, was baked in tins and was marketed as part of a range of sliced cakes.

The commissioners contended that the product was "other confectionery" and not a cake. The product should be looked at as a whole. The base of the product was too firm to be a cake and the moisture content too low.

Held, allowing the company's appeal:

1. In appearance the product looked like a cake and there was nothing inconsistent with a cake in either its...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ferrero UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • July 12, 1995
    ...No. 8850; [1993] BVC 1311 Kathy's Kones Ltd VAT(MAN/93/994) No. 11,705; [1995] BVC 1390 Marks & Spencer plc VAT(LON/88/1316) No. 4510; (1990) 5 BVC 537 Swedish Snowball Production Ltd VAT(MAN/86/305) No. 2311; (1987) 3 BVC 1313 UB (Biscuits) Ltd VAT(LON/85/560 and LON/86/18) No. 2040; (1986......
  • United Biscuits (UK) Ltd (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • August 21, 1991
    ...United Biscuits (UK) Ltd (No. 2) The following cases were referred to in the decision: Marks & Spencer plcVAT (LON/88/1316) No. 4510; (1990) 5 BVC 537 Panini Publishing Ltd and Mirror Group Newspapers LtdVAT(LON/88/166 and 887) No. 3876; (1989) 4 BVC 704 Zero-rating - Food - Whether "Jaffa ......
  • TC03754: Lees of Scotland Ltd; Thomas Tunnock Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • June 25, 2014
    ...(1990) 5 BVC 1,314. (Cottrell) [13]United Biscuits (UK) Ltd (No 2)VAT [1991] BVC 818 (Jaffa Cakes) [14]Marks & Spencer plcVAT (1990) 5 BVC 537. (M&S1) [15]Marcantonio Foods LtdVAT [1998] BVC 4,099 (Marcantonio) [16]United Biscuits (UK) LtdTAX [2011] TC 01515. (Pringle 3) [17]Ferrero UK LtdV......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT