Marren v Dawson Bentley & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1961 |
| Date | 1961 |
| Court | Assizes |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
- Wong Kim Fatt v Yong Kwet Yin
-
Anthony John Page and Another v Hewetts Solicitors and Another
...The Claimants rely in this regard on Pritam v S. Russell & Sons [1973] 1 QB 336 (CA) at 337F, 348C-F, 350C and 365F, approving Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB 135, for the proposition that the first day after the event is not counted, so that time expired at the end of 6 Febru......
-
Verderers of the New Forest v Andrew Young, Austin Walter Young and Others (No 2)
...run until the day after the date of the alleged offence. That that is indeed the case is clear from a decision of this court in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 AER 270. 12 However, the Deputy District Judge was not aware of that authority when she made the decision which we have t......
-
Pritam Kaur v S. Russell & Sons Ltd
...the first day, 5th September 1967, on which the accident occurred. it was so held by Mr. Justice Hovers in Marren v. Dawson Huntley Ltd (1961) 2 Q B 135. The defendant here, by his cress-notice, challenged that decision: but I think it was plainly 3If you count three years from 5th Septemb......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Limitation Periods After Midnight Deadlines: The Saga Continues In The Supreme Court
...not inconsistent with Radcliffe v Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161; ought to have been distinguished in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB 135; and was not expressly disapproved in Pritam Kaur v S Russell & Sons Ltd [1973] QB 336 Lord Stephens considered that the justification for that......
-
Limitation Periods After Midnight Deadlines: The Saga Continues In The Supreme Court
...not inconsistent with Radcliffe v Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161; ought to have been distinguished in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB 135; and was not expressly disapproved in Pritam Kaur v S Russell & Sons Ltd [1973] QB 336 Lord Stephens considered that the justification for that......
-
Professional Negligence: On The Stroke Of Midnight The Limitation Clock Started Ticking
...of Appeal authority of Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336 and the first instance decision in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135, which established that where a cause of action accrues part way through a day, that day should be excluded for limitation purposes. Both ......
-
Matthew And Others (Appellants) v Sedman And Others (Respondents) [2021] UKSC 19
...with the case of Radcliffe -v- Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161, expressly disapproved in the case of Marren -v- Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB 135; implicitly disapproved in the case of Pritam Kaur -v- S Russell & Sons Ltd [1973] QB 336. The Supreme Court judge disagreed, citing the follow......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...9.48 Markham-David v Bluebird Holidays Limited, 5 November 1998 (unreported), Salisbury Cty Ct 6.41, 7.87 Marren v Dawson, Bentley & Co [1961] 2 QB 135, [1961] 2 WLR 679, [1961] 2 All ER 270, 105 SJ 383 10.108 Marsh v Commissioners of Police [1945] KB 43, [1944] 2 All ER 392, CA 8.24 Table ......
-
International Conventions and Regulations - Carriage of Passengers and Baggage
...to this effect: Air Tahiti v McKenzie [2009] NSWCA 429, 264 ALR 709 (New South Wales Court of Appeal). 117 Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co [1961] 2 QB 135, by analogy with the 3-year personal injury limitation period under Limitation Act 1980, section 11. 118 Pritam Kaur v Russell [1973] QB 33......