Marshal v Crutwell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
35 cases
- Ng Sin Chai v Ng Ah Bee and Another
-
Re Shephard. Shephard v Cartwright
...in 1 Mylne and Keen Reports at page 511, Lord Brougham admitted a codicil in evidence, though he gave no weight to it. In 1875 in Marshall v. Critwell, reported in Law Reports 20 Equity at page 328, Sir George Jessel, Master of the Rolls, admitted evidence of subsequent acts by a husband an......
- Calverley v Green
-
Yeo Guan Chye Terence and another v Lau Siew Kim
...or contribution was made for the purpose of convenience (for example, in cases of jointly-held bank accounts: see Marshal v Crutwell (1875) LR 20 Eq 328 and Low Gim Siah ([76] supra) at [52]–[53]), this is plainly not the case on the facts of the instant 145 The second and third points rais......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Confiscation Orders: Avoid a ‘Determination’ by ‘Taking a View’: R v Hilton (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 29
...joint names in law does not mean that both named parties havea joint beneficial ownership interest in that account (Marshal v Crutwell (1875) LR 20 Eq 328). Suchquestions turn on legal presumptions, the relationship of the joint account holders, and careful investi-gation of mutual intentio......