Marsland v Taggart
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1928 |
| Date | 1928 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Re Tang King Kai
... ... A three-member committee, minus the chairman, is not a committee within the meaning of the Act. Mr Khoo relied on the case of Marsland v Taggart [1928] 2 KB 447. But that case is not quite on point. There a magistrate court consisting of three justices dismissed a complaint but ... ...
-
Bluecrest v HMRC
...income. It is true that the content of this requirement does not take the enquiry very far. As Rowlatt J explained in Ryall v Hoare [1928] 2 KB 447 at 454–455, the word “annual” in this context denotes only “calculated in any one year”, and “annual profits or gains” mean “profits or gains ......
-
Oilfields Workers' Trade Union v Hydro-Agri Trinidad Ltd (Formerly Federation Chemicals Ltd)
...[1989] 168 C.L.R. (Australian High Court) Kemraj Harrikissoon v. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago 31 W.I.R. 348 (PC) Marsland v. Taggart [1928] 2 K.B. 447 (CA) Nankissoon Boodram v. Attorney General and Another (1995) 47 W.I.R. 459 (PC) Nutrimix Feeds Ltd. and United Hatcherie......