Martin v Bannister

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1878
Year1878
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Whitter v Peters; Peart v Stewart
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 1981
    ...of a court is not a penalty, strictly so-called, and that failure to obey such an order is not properly described as an offence. In Martin v. Bannister 1879 4 QBD 212 and 491 a very strong Court of Appeal (Bramwell, Brett and Cotton LL.JJ.) affirmed the opinion of an equally strong Division......
  • Shell E & P Ireland Ltd v McGrath (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 December 2006
  • Whitter v Peters; Peart v Stewart
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 10 March 1983
    ...Appeal there is a certain irony in the fact that it was precisely because a county court was an "inferior court" that it was held in Martin v. Bannister (1879) 4 Q.B.D. 212 (D.C.) and 491 (C.A.) that it was invested with the power to grant injunctions and enforce them by attachment under se......
  • Campbell v M'Clelland
    • Ireland
    • Common Pleas Division (Ireland)
    • 16 April 1886
    ...v. BradshawELR 5 Q. B. D. 302. Costelloe v. ColganUNK 13 Ir. L. T. 61, 373. Coughlan v. MorrisUNK 6 L. R. Ir. 405. Martin v. BannisterELR 4 Q. B. D. 491. Kearney v. HannonUNK 10 L. R. Ir. 17. Wheeler v. The United Telephone Co.ELR 13 Q. B. D. 597. Goutard v. Carr Ibid. 598, note. Nichols v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT