Martin v Delbo
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1219
King's Bench Division
[465] 11. martin versus delbo. Stat' de Limitations extend al merchants apres 1'account stated. En action sur assurapsib plaintiff declare dun agreement q defendant payer a luy tant argent & le proceed de c sur rett' de tiel neife, et averr que la neife fuit return, et le proceed del argent fuit state inter le defendant & J. S. Et q tout amount al 13001. per quel action acrue al pi', le defendant plead Lestat' de Limitacons, et le doubt fuit le quel ceo aoit account stated (intant q ne fuit inter les partya) car si fuit account stated doq nest de c teps deins lexeeption del atat' 21 Jac. ca. 16. de Limitacona que dit other than such accounts as concern the trade of merchandize between merchant and merchant car del stating del account c deveigne certain debt que fuit devant uncertain. Et issint coment account poet surge 20 ana ou pluis inter merchants sans ascun danger del Stat' de Limitacons in respect del exception avant q fuit fait sur bone reason, et eel diversity inter accounts stated & aut accounta come fuit dit ad ee agree in ceat Court, et ne fuit ore deny, mea le Court voet advise sur le pleading (soil.) si 1220 mich. 22 car. II. B. R. i am. 48. per ceo apt que la est account stated car tant que eat, est agree p le pleading del Stat' de Limitacons. Nota q Sir Geffery Palmer del Middle Temple aiant e'e Attorney General le...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Webber v Tivill
...reason : and this diversity between accounts stated and unstated, as it was said, had been often agreed, and was not denied by the Court. 1 Sid. 465, Martin v. Delbo. S. C. 1 Mod. 70. 1 Vent. 89. 1 Lev. 298. So where in an indebitatus assumpsit for money had and received to the plaintiff's ......
-
Hall v Wybourn
...beyond sea does not avoid the Statute of Limitations. Comber. 190. 2 Mod. 311. Note; The law is not altered by stat. 4 & 5 Ann. c. 16. 1 Sid. 465. 2 Vent. 256. 3 Lev. 21, 283, 367. 6 Mod. 240. Show. 99. Jon. 253. In bar of the Statute of Limitations, the plaintiff replied, that the defendan......
-
Coventry v Apsley
...beyond sea does not avoid the Statute of Limitations. Comber. 190. 2 Mod. 311. Note; The law is not altered by stat. 4 & 5 Ann. c. 16. 1 Sid. 465. 2 Vent. 256. 3 Lev. 21, 283, 367. 6 Mod. 240. Show. 99. Jon. 253. In bar of the Statute of Limitations, the plaintiff replied, that the defendan......
-
Isaac Robinson, surviving Administrator of the Estate of George Robinson, deceased, - Appellant; Daniel Alexander, on behalf of himself and other the Creditors of the said Intestate, George Robinson, - Respondent
...they certified that the statute was no bar, because the account was not final, and also that it was between merchants. Martin v. Delbo, 1 Sid. 465.; S.C. 1 Mod. 70.; 1 Vent. 89.; 1 Lev. 298. In this case it was held that, after an account stated, it is not within the exception of the statut......