Martin v Nadel. Dresdner Bank, Garnishees
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1906 |
| Year | 1906 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc. v Government of India
...with the result that the third party's debt to the judgment debtor may not be treated as discharged if the Order is complied with. In Martin v Nadel [1906] 2 KB 26, at page 29, Vaughan Williams, LJ said that in respect of a third party debt owed by a German bank, with a branch in London: “......
-
Société Eram Shipping Company Ltd v Cie Internationale de Navigation
...; Phillips v Allan (1828) 8 B & C 477 ; Bartley v Hodges (1861) 1 B & S 375 ; 30 LJ (QB) 352 ." This statement remains good law. In Martin v Nadel [1906] 2 KB 26 , where a garnishee order was sought in England against the London branch of a German bank to attach a balance owed to the......
-
Deutsche Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesellschaft m.b.H. v R'as al-Khaimah National Oil Company
...673, per. Bankes I.J. at page 678, and Scrutton J at 681. Atkin L.J., after referring to an observation of Vaughan Williams L.J. in Martin & Ors. v. Nadel (1906) 2 K.B. 26, which appears to be much too wide, said, at page 38"But where a competent Court issues execution upon property situat......
-
Deutsche Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesellschaft m.b.H. v R'as al-Khaimah National Oil Company
...to be garnished is situate in England; fifthly the British bank does not submit to the jurisdiction in Ruritania. 28In Martin v. Nadel (Dresdner Bank Garnishees) [1906] 2 K.B 26 a garnishee order was sought against the London branch of a German bank which held as security money deposited b......
Request a trial to view additional results