Mascoll v Scaife

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1765
Date01 January 1765
CourtHigh Court of Admiralty

English Reports Citation: 167 E.R. 444

HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY

Mascoll
and
Scaife

{3] hascoll v. scaipe. 3rd Sees. East. Term, 1765.-Q. Certificate discontinued. Is the appeal thereby deserted ?-Cause to go on This cause was in the first instance determined at Nova Scotia on a seizure made in 1758 by His Majesty's ship " Vulture," Captain Scaife, of the schooner " Love," Mascoll, &c , owners, for illicit trade From that sentence there was an appeal, which has been prosecuted, but the certificate has been discontinued for two years. The question therefore is, Whether the appeal is not to be considered deserted by reason of a treaty of agreement which was on foot between the proctors of the contending parties Crespigny appeared and alledged that he knew nothing of the cause till within these ten days ; for that it had been under treaty of agreement, which is now at an end, and prays that Fuller may be assigned to extend his protest. Fuller alledged there was no cause before the Court by reason of its being deserted for two years, and that he knew nothing of the agreement. The affidavits of Captain Scaife and his agent, Mr Manger, were read, stating that they knew not, or had given orders for entering into such treaty of agreement. An affidavit of . . was read, which set forth that he knew there had been such a treaty on foot. Dr. Harris.-Their affidavits do not contradict ours, for the agreement was between the respective proctors (Mr. Crespigny, senior, and Mr. Farrar, who are both dead), they alledging it in the continuation , and on this account Crespigny is justified in doing nothing for two years, and the treaty being now broke off he has a right to proceed in his appeal. The inhibition, monition, and certificate not being coTxtinmed is no reason for decreeing the appeal to be deserted. If the proctor's protest is bad he must appear. There is no use in continuing the certificate from Gourt Day to Court Day. The repetition of such assignation would be nugatory, and no practice can be right which is not founded in reason. It was so determined by the Lords, even when there was [4] no certificate at all, in the case of Captain Grooshanks, 1751, upon an appeal from Gibraltar, the monition and inhibition being returned without a certificate ; and though Sir George Lee spoke an hour with respect to the practice, Lord Granville asked whether the effect of the process was obtained, and being answered in the affirmative, said a nicety of practice ought not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Dickinson v Burrell; Stourton v Burrell
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 25 Enero 1866
    ...They are necessary parties to the suit, and it is suggested that they are not parties: but it appears that four 896 DICKINSON V. BURRELL 3J BBAV. 261. persons of the name of Dickinson are Defendants, and though the allegation, is not precise that these are the persons in question, I think t......
  • Leonard v Taylor
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 22 Abril 1873
    ...would be granted. The Plaintiff has paid a fine to the Defendant which should be returned. Counsel also, referred to Williams v. Burrell (3) ; Shep. Touchstone, by Preston, 167 ; &ranks v. St. John (4) ; Bandy v. Cartright (5); Rawson v. Grogan (6); Lord Ashton v. Larke (7); Platt on Covena......
  • Phelps v Prothero
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 Enero 1847
    ...company represents the company for this purpose: Hall v. Gonnell (3 Y. & C. C. C. 707). [He also cited Amey v. Long (1 Camp. 14), Lee v. Burrell (3 Camp. 337), Sex v. Woodley (1 Moo. & Eob. 390), Beg. v. Greenway (2 New Sess. Gas. 103), Beg. v. Lord John Russell (7 Dowl. P. C. 693), and Doe......
  • Goh Soo Siah v Au Yeung Tin Wah And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 22 Diciembre 2015
    ...my discretion to grant the relief against sanction in the interests of justice.” p. In Lai Sai Sang v UBS AG (unrep., HCA97/2010, DHCJ Burrell,3 April 2012), the plaintiff had been in breach of an “unless order” for specific discovery of documents. The Master dismissed the plaintiff’s actio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • A SECOND NOTE ON AGEING IN A LIBRARY CIRCULATION MODEL: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Documentation No. 42-2, February 1986
    • 1 Febrero 1986
    ...IN A PREVIOUS PAPER Burrell1 demonstrated how the mixed Poisson model for library loans presented by Burrell and Cane2 (but see also Burrell3,4 for less technical descriptions) could be modified in a simple way to accommodate the em-pirical phenomenon of ageing of the collection under consi......
  • NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Documentation No. 46-1, January 1990
    • 1 Enero 1990
    ...In the text Van Dijk distinguishes two kinds of mental relevance assignment readers make during reading comprehension [1]. Morse [2] and Burrell (3) have proposed alternative models, while Spur lock [4] has analysed a large sample of data to give preliminary results in good agreement with V......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT