Mastercard Incorporated and Others v Merricks
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 51 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
BT Group Plc v Justin Le Patourel
...and Lloyd 9 The nature and effect of the legislation has been considered in two judgments of the Supreme Court: Mastercard v Merricks [2020] UKSC 51 (“ Merricks”) and Lloyd v Google Inc [2021] UKSC 50 (“ Lloyd”). Both were explored before us in written and oral submissions. Merricks conce......
-
R (on the application of PACCAR Inc. and Others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and Others
...Phillips in Factortame (No 8). 128 The collective proceedings regime in the CAT was described by this court in Merricks v Mastercard Inc [2020] UKSC 51, [2021] Bus LR 25 (“ Merricks”). That appeal concerned the proposed opt-out claim lodged by Mr Merricks against Mastercard arising out of......
-
Royal Mail Group Ltd v DAF Trucks Ltd
...Mr Beard KC had cited a number of authorities, he had not taken the Court to the judgment of the majority of the Supreme Court in Mastercard v Merricks [2020] UKSC 51 which contains an authoritative statement as to how the broad axe should be applied. Difficulties in quantification should ......
-
Lloyd v Google LLC
...is referred to in the CAT Rules as “an aggregate award of damages”: see rule 73(2). 32 As Lord Briggs explained in Merricks v Mastercard [2020] UKSC 51; [2021] Bus LR 25, at para 76, section 47C(2) of the Competition Act “radically alters the established common law compensatory principle by......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
UK Class Actions: Opt-in Or Opt-out?
...proceedings. To view the full article, please click here. Footnotes 1. Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51. 2. BT Group plc and British Telecommunications plc v Justin Le Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 3. Justin Le Patourel v BT Group plc and British Telec......
-
Environmental Claims Against UK Parent Companies: Emerging Trends And The Court Of Appeal Ruling In The Fund'o Dam Class Action
...reforms of collective redress and on the Supreme Court's decision in Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51. 10 Appeal Judgment, paragraph 11 Appeal Judgment, paragraph 6. 12 See, for example, AAA v Unilever and Okpabi v Shell. 13 Appeal Judgment, parag......
-
Putting The Carriage Into Reverse: The CAT Resolves To Determine A Carriage Dispute In 'Opt-Out' Class Action Proceedings As A Preliminary Issue
...whereas in "opt-in" proceedings claimants need to actively opt into the claim. 9. Walter Merricks CBE v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors [2020] UKSC 51; see our client insight in relation to that judgment 10. Judgment, paragraph 3. 11. Judgment, paragraph 10. 12. Judgment, paragraph 13. 13. Ju......
-
A Carriage To Nowhere: CAT Willing To Certify FX Class Action, But Only On An 'Opt-In' Basis
...Chrysler Automobiles N.V.) and Others; Road Haulage Association Limited v Man SE and Others [2022] CAT 25. 6 MasterCard Inc v. Merricks [2020] UKSC 51. 7 These decisions involved materially the same conduct, and so the CAT only felt the need to describe the infringing conduct in the "Three ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel a combler.
...(113) Voir par ex Gibson v Pride Mobility Products Limited, [2017] CAT 9 aux para 102-20. (114) Voir Mastercard Incorporated v Merricks, [2020] UKSC 51. Il est interessant de noter que la cour attribue a ce nouveau vehicule procedural des objectifs similaires a ceux de l'action collective q......