Mastercard Incorporated and Others v Merricks
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 51 |
| Year | 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
31 cases
- PACCAR Inc. and Others v Road Haulage Association Ltd and another (Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales intervening); R (on the application of PACCAR Inc. and Others) v Competition Appeal Tribunal (UK Trucks Claim Ltd and Others, interested parties) (Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales intervening)
-
BT Group Plc v Justin Le Patourel
...but it is limited to points of law only. We address the implications of this jurisdiction in greater detail at paragraphs [50] – [57] below. Merricks and Lloyd 9 The nature and effect of the legislation has been considered in two judgments of the Supreme Court: Mastercard v Merricks [2020] ......
-
Lloyd v Google LLC
...of damages is referred to in the CAT Rules as “an aggregate award of damages”: see rule 73(2). 32 As Lord Briggs explained in Merricks v Mastercard [2020] UKSC 51; [2021] Bus LR 25, at para 76, section 47C(2) of the Competition Act “radically alters the established common law compensatory p......
-
Harrington Scott Ltd v Coupe Bradbury Solicitors Ltd
...Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] AC 742 Masood v Zahoor [2009] EWCA Civ 650, [2010] 1 WLR 746 Merricks v Mastercard Inc [2020] UKSC 51, [2021] Bus LR 25 Midland Bank v Hett, Stubbs & Kemp [1979] Ch 384 Navig8 Inc v South Vigour Shipping Inc [2015] EWHC 32 (Comm) Pin......
Get Started for Free
7 firm's commentaries
-
Global Payments Newsletter, December 2020
...claim On 11 December 2020 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51. This was an appeal by Mastercard to challenge a Court of Appeal judgment that had held that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) had erred i......
-
UK Class Actions: Opt-in Or Opt-out?
...proceedings. To view the full article, please click here. Footnotes 1. Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51. 2. BT Group plc and British Telecommunications plc v Justin Le Patourel [2022] EWCA Civ 3. Justin Le Patourel v BT Group plc and British Telec......
-
Group Litigation: What Businesses Need To Know
...5. David Abbott and others v Ministry of Defence [2023] EWHC 1475 (KB) 6. Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51 7. See here and Originally Published by 27 July 2023 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matte......
-
Environmental Claims Against UK Parent Companies: Emerging Trends And The Court Of Appeal Ruling In The Fund'o Dam Class Action
...reforms of collective redress and on the Supreme Court's decision in Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51. 10 Appeal Judgment, paragraph 11 Appeal Judgment, paragraph 6. 12 See, for example, AAA v Unilever and Okpabi v Shell. 13 Appeal Judgment, parag......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Let's Talk About Consumers: Competition Law Compensation for Indirect Purchasers' Losses-A United Kingdom Perspective
...v. Pepper : Rationalizing Antitrust’s Indirect Purchaser Rule , 120 COLUM. L. REV. F. 14 (2020). 10 See, e.g. , Mastercard v. Merricks [2020] UKSC 51, [¶ 1] (Lord Briggs) (appeal taken from CAT); id. ¶¶ 84–85 (Lords Sales and Leggatt) (discussed further infra ). 392 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL [V......
-
Unintended Consequences of Repealing the Direct Purchaser Rule
...2020), www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/merricks-v-mastercard-passing-on-the-u-s-experience/. See also Mastercard Inc. v. Merricks, [2020] UKSC 51 (later ruling affirming class certification). Taken together, Delrahim’s positions suggest that repealing the direct purchaser rule could ......
-
Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel a combler.
...(113) Voir par ex Gibson v Pride Mobility Products Limited, [2017] CAT 9 aux para 102-20. (114) Voir Mastercard Incorporated v Merricks, [2020] UKSC 51. Il est interessant de noter que la cour attribue a ce nouveau vehicule procedural des objectifs similaires a ceux de l'action collective q......