Matthew v State

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2004
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Qarase v Bainimarama
    • Fiji
    • Court of Appeal (Fiji)
    • 1 January 2009
  • Sanatan Charma Maha Sabha of Trinidad and Tobago Inc. and Others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 28 April 2009
    ...all things necessary for the exercise under any existing law of any prerogative or privilege vested in Her Majesty. Following Matthew v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] 1 AC 433, in which it was held that whether or not the law decreeing the mandatory death penalty was an infringement of......
  • Hunte and Khan v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 16 July 2015
    ... ... Mr Roe submitted that in this respect Ramdeen was wrongly decided and so was the earlier case of Matthew v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] 1 AC 433 , in which the Board made a similar order ... 50 The judgment of the majority in Ramdeen was written by me. I am now persuaded that it was wrong, that the Board did not have jurisdiction to order commutation of the sentence in Ramdeen ... ...
  • Ramdeen v The State
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 27 March 2014
    ...the question to the High Court unless in his opinion the raising of the question is merely frivolous or vexatious." 44 In Matthew v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] 1 AC 433 the appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death on 3 December 1999. He appealed against conviction ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT