Mattocks v Mann
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 11 June 1992 |
| Date | 11 June 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Burdis v Livsey ; Clark v Ardington Electrical Services ; Dennard v Plant ; Sen v Steelform Engineering Company Ltd ; Lagden v O'Connor
...that the plaintiff could recover because the industrial action was foreseeable. 121 We believe that the approach of the Court of Appeal in Mattocks applies to this case. The defendants' actions damaged the cars of Mrs Clark and Mr Dennard. They should pay the loss caused by their actions. T......
-
Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company
...v Sir William Arrol & Co LtdWLR [1962] 1 WLR 295. Marfani & Co Ltd v Midland Bank LtdWLR [1968] 1 WLR 956. Mattocks v MannUNK [1993] RTR 13. Mediana, TheELR [1900] AC 113. Mihalis Angelos, TheELR [1971] 1 QB 164. Moore v DER LtdWLR [1971] 1 WLR 1476. Novello & Co Ltd v Hinrischs......
-
Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v Herbert Broderick
...then it seems to me that the principle of The Liesbosch… no longer applies in its full rigour." (page 1307D). 28Thirdly more recently in Mattocks v. Mann [1993] R.T.R. 13 at page 19 Beldam L.J. (with whom Nourse and Stocker L.J.J. agreed) referred to what he had said in Bolton v. Price (un......
-
Lagden v O'Connor
...the other party, then it seems to me that the principle of The Liesbosch [1933] AC 449 no longer applies in its full rigour." 57 In Mattocks v Mann [1993] RTR 13, 19 Beldam LJ, with whom Nourse and Stocker LJJ agreed, referring to his observations in Bolton v Price (unreported), 24 Novembe......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Property damage and the impecuniosity factor in commonwealth jurisdictions
...more recent cases of Bolton v Price (unreported) Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Transcript No 1159 of 1939, cited in Mattocks v Mann [1993] RTR 13. In both cases Beldam LJ pointed out that it is only in exceptional cases that impecuniosicy can be isolated as a separate cause and as termi......