May & Baker (t/a Sanofi-Aventis Pharma) v Okerago

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral CitationUKEAT/0278/09 ZT
Date2010
Year2010
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Mr Tariq Sami v Mr Abel Avellan and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
    ...to the extent that the dismissal had already taken place and so could not be “helped” after the event (see May & Baker v Okergo [2010] IRLR 394 at the claim could properly be analysed as an allegation that the Fourth Respondent helped an act of discrimination closely connected to a relation......
  • Mr Kemeh v Ministry of Defence
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 February 2014
    ...have purported to follow it (although there was some dispute before us as to whether they have always in fact done so): see, e.g. May and Baker Ltd v Okerago [2010] IRLR 394 (HHJ Birtles presiding) and Bungay v Saini UEAT/0331/10/CEA; (2011) EqLR 1130 (Silber J presiding). Mr Reed, who did ......
  • Miss Walker v Blackpool and Fylde College: 3400329/2017
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 21 December 2017
    ...by the respondent Virdi v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] IRLR 24, Mayer and Baker Limited trading as Sanofi-Aventis Pharma v Okerago [2010] IRLR 394, Roberston v Bexley Community Centre trading as Leisure Link IRLR 434 and British Coal Corporation v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336 t......
  • Ministry of Defence v Mr W Kemeh
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 11 March 2013
    ...see Yearwood v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (2004) ICR 1660 (HHJ McMullen QC and Members), followed in May and Baker Ltd v Okerago (2010) IRLR 394 (HHJ Birtles and Members) and Bungay v Saini (UEAT/0331/10/CEA (2011) EqLR 1130) (Silber J and Members). In these circumstances it is conced......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT