McCutcheon v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Beattie v HM Advocate
...v HigsonUNK 2003 SLT 1053; 2003 SCCR 490 King v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1999 JC 226; 1999 SLT 604; 1999 SCCR 330 McCutcheon v HM AdvocateUNK 2002 SLT 27; 2002 SCCR 101 McDonald v HM AdvocateUNKUNK [2008] UKPC 46; 2008 SLT 993; 2008 SCCR 954; [2009] HRLR 3; [2009] UKHRR 46 McInnes v HM AdvocateSCUN......
-
Appeals Against Conviction And Sentence By (1) Gary William Sim; (2) James Edward Watson And (3) Paul John Watson
...SLT 670; 2009 SCCR 548 Keaney v HM Advocate [2015] HCJAC 3; 2015 JC 259; 2015 SLT 102; 2015 SCCR 81; 2015 SCL 316 McCutcheon v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 27; 2002 SCCR 104 McGirr v HM Advocate [2007] HCJAC 7; 2007 JC 83; 2007 SCCR 80; 2007 GWD 4–59 McIntosh v HM Advocate 2003 SLT 545; 2003 SCCR 1......
-
Adam Morrison V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...AdvocateUNK [2009] HCJAC 83; 2009 SCCR 918; 2010 SCL 265 Dudgeon v HM AdvocateUNK 1988 SLT 476; 1988 SCCR 147 McCutcheon v HM AdvocateUNK 2002 SLT 27; 2002 SCCR 101 Randall v RUNKWLRUNKUNK [2002] UKPC 19; [2002] 1 WLR 2237; [2002] 2 Cr App R 17; [2002] Crim LR 928 Ross v HM AdvocateUNK 1994......
-
Robert Mcphee Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...Hendry v HM Advocate 1985 JC 105; Meechan v HM Advocate 1970 JC 11; Morrison v HM Advocate 1991 SLT 57; and McCutcheon v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 27. In relation to statements by accused persons to the police in the course of investigations prior to 25 January 2018, the old rules continue to ap......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Corroboration in Scots Law: “Archaic Rule” or “Invaluable Safeguard”?
...thinking that no one confesses to crimes of which they are innocent.128128A view adopted by the courts: e.g. McCutcheon v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 27 at para 6; Hartley v HM Advocate 1979 SLT 26 at 32. Cf also the rule that very little evidence is required to corroborate an unequivocal confessi......
-
Margaret L Ross and James P Chalmers, WALKER AND WALKER: THE LAW OF EVIDENCE IN SCOTLAND Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing (www.tottelpublishing.com), 3rd edn, 2009. ci + 616 pp. ISBN 9781845921651. £120.
...in case law, such as Cinci v HM Advocate 2004 JC 103 on the corroboration of sexual offences and res gestae; McCutcheon v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 27 on mixed statements; and HM Advocate v Higgins 2006 SLT 946 on the admissibility of confessions obtained through deception, all of which are deal......