McFarlane v McFarlane

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
Judgment Date01 January 1972
Date01 January 1972
CourtCourt of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
(C.A.)
McFarlane V. McFarlane

Wife's application for declaration of interest - House purchased by husband - Wife's contributions - Married Women's Property Act, 1882 (44 45 Vict. c.75), s. 17.

The parties were married in 1946 and separated in 1968. At the time of the marriage the wife was a principal teacher in a primary school and was provided with a free school-house; the husband, who had no home and no settled occupation, moved into the school-house with the wife. After the marriage the husband began dealing in second-hand cars, and later built up a profitable business in car insurance broking. In this he was helped by the wife who did clerical work in connection with the business in the evenings. In 1957 the wife gave up teaching and thereafter worked full-time in the brokerage business. In June, 1959, the husband bought property which previously he had rented: this property was the matrimonial home from 1953 to April, 1960. In October, 1959, the husband bought a further property, and this property was the matrimonial home from April, 1960, to the separation of the parties in 1968. The wife took proceedings in the County Court of Down under s. 17 of the Married Women's Property Act, 1882, for a declaration that she was entitled beneficially to a half-interest in each of the two properties. Held, by the Court of Appeal (Lord MacDermott L.C.J. and Lowry J.) that the wife had no interest of a beneficial kind in either of the two properties. (Per Lord MacDermott L.C.J.) In the absence of proof to the contrary a spouse who had acquired the legal title to property purchased with the aid of a substantial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Butterfield v Butterfield
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • September 28, 2009
  • McGill v Snodgrass
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • July 25, 1979
    ...find it necessary to call in aid the following extract from the judgment of Sir Robert Lowry (as he then was) in McFarlane .v. McFarlane 1972 N.I. 59 at page 78: "In my opinion the recent cases in the House of Lords clearly show that the rights acquired by a wife in property which at law b......
  • Oxley v Hiscock
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 6, 2004
    ...these situations give rise. The effect of these two decisions is very helpfully analysed in the judgment of Lord MacDermott LCJ in McFarlane v McFarlane [1972] NI 59. Outstanding examples on the other hand of cases giving rise to situations in the first category are Eves v Eves [1975] 1 W......
  • Hanlon v The Law Society
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • May 1, 1980
    ...by your Lordships' House in cases such as Pettitt v. Pettitt [1970] A.C. 777 and Gissing v. Gissing [1971] A.C. 886 and applied in McFarlane v. McFarlane [1972] N.I.59 had any equitable interest in the house. The issues which would have had to be decided in her favour by analogy with secti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Family Home: Constructive and Resulting Trusts in Irish and English Law
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. II-1999, January 1999
    • January 1, 1999
    ...and duration" of such work. Curiously, 20 Supra, fn 11. This decision may be contrasted with the decision in McFarlane v. McFarlane [1972] NI 59 in which Lord McDermott L.C.J. took a directly opposite approach to the issue of indirect contributions finding that they vested no interest in th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT