McKenzie v Hesketh
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1877 |
| Year | 1877 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Chong Ah Kwee and Another v Viva Realty Pte Ltd
...45 ER 1230 (folld) Hill v Buckley (1811) 17 Ves 394; 34 ER 153 (folld) Joliffe v Baker (1883) 11 QBD 255 (distd) McKenzie v Hesketh (1877) 7 Ch D 675 (folld) Owmist Pty Ltd v Twynam Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 196 (refd) Palmer v Johnson (1884) 13 QBD 351 (refd) Rudd v Lascelles [190......
- Cox v Hoban
-
Tully v Robinson
... ... 26 In McKenzie v. Hesketh (1877) 7 Ch D 675 a not dissimilar question arose. The defendant had in error accepted an offer to lease 249 acres for £500 but in fact ... ...
-
Connor v Potts
...210; 33 Ch. D. [16, 18. In re Stevens Unreported. Lavery v. PursellELR 39 Ch. D. 508. Manser v. BackUNK 6 Ha. 443. Mc Kenzie v. HeskethELR 7 Ch. D. 675. Neap v. AbbottENR C. P. Cooper, 333. Phelps v. WhiteUNK 5 L. R. Ir. 318; 7 L. R. Ir. l60. Powell v. ElliottELR L. R. 10 Ch. 424. Re Bonham......
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Advice Privilege and the Corporate Client
...Privilege) [1997] AC 16, HL.21 Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (Disclosure) (No. 3) [2002] EWHC 2730, [2003] CP Rep 34.22 (1881) LR 17 Ch D 675. 188 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFLEGAL ADVICE PRIVILEGE AND THE CORPORATE CLIENTemployee communications could be protected by ad......