McKinnon Industries Ltd v Walker
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1951 |
| Date | 1951 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Audrey Allwood v Administrator General of Jamaica and Mega Marketing Ltd
...this prima facie entitlement to an injunction, it is for the wrongdoer to satisfy the court that the special circumstance exists: Mackinnon Industries v Walker [1951] W.N. 401. It therefore appears that there is no bias against a consideration of the adequacy of damages in the bosom of just......
-
Conrad James Josephine James Claimants v (1) Solange Jn Baptiste (2) Catherine Jn Baptiste (3) Livinus Fontenio (4) Paule Jn Baptiste (5) Lennie Augustin (6) Kensley Jn Baptiste Defendants [ECSC]
...disentitle him to a perpetual injunction against the continuance of the Defendants' acts of trespass:(Mc Kennon Industries v Walker [1957] W.N. 401 [1957] W.N. 401 (PC), 65 In my opinion, Mr and Mrs James are entitled to a perpetual Injunction against the Defendants, but having regard to th......
-
Students’ Association, Saskatchewan Polytechnic Regina Inc. v Saskatchewan Polytechnic, 2017 SKCA 13
...wrong as to amount to an injustice and invite intervention on that basis. (See, for example, McKinnon Industries Ltd. v. Walker, [1951] 3 D.L.R. 577, at 579 (P.C.) and Saskatchewan Power Corporation v. Doe, [1988] 6 W.W.R. 634 (Sask. C.A.)). The remaining issues deal with the interpretation......
1 books & journal articles
-
Of Coase and Corn: A (Sort of) Defence of Private Nuisance
...no conventional standing, particularly in acase of environmental harm.106 n 12 above, 323–324.107 Despite McKinnon Industries vWalker [1951] 3 DLR 577.108 (1889) 41 Ch D 88.109 Hayek n 48 above, 65. The basic point is, so far as I am aware, derived from Hume. D. Hume,Enquiries, 2nd edn (Oxf......