McKoen v Ellis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1987 |
| Year | 1987 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 cases
-
McArthur v Valentine
...ordinary sense of the word be regarded as "driving"; seeJones v. PrattUNK [1983] R.T.R. 54, per Woolf J. at p. 59; McKoen v. EllisUNK [1987] R.T.R. 26. We have to say, with the greatest of respect to those who think otherwise, that we are not attracted by the idea that two tests should be a......
3 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...of a number of factors, of which the first is that the accused person was “driving” on the occasion in question. In McKeon v. Ellis [1987] R.T.R. 26, the sole question at issue was whether the defendant’s manhandling and manoeuvring his motor cycle could as a matter of law properly be said ......
-
Table of Cases
...! [1995] Crim LR 69, HL! 290 , 291, 299, 300 ..................................... McKoen v Ellis [1987] RTR 26, [1987] Crim LR 54, DC! 422 ................................................. McMahon v CPS [2001] EWHC Admin 180, DC! 236 ......................... McNeil v DPP [2008] EWHC 1254 ......
-
Definitions
...really depends upon the circumstances and how sensible people looks at it …” Appeal dismissed. 421 CHAPTER 9: DEFINITIONS McKoen v Ellis [1987] RTR 26, [1987] Crim LR 54, 26 June 1986, QBD (DC) The court below was not wrong to find that a defendant had been controlling the movement and dir......