McLAREN MURDOCH & HAMILTON Ltd Pursuers against THE ABERCROMBY MOTOR GROUP Ltd Defenders
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Court of Session (Outer House) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
- Scottish Widows Services Ltd v Harmon/CRM Facades Ltd
- Slemming v Ross
-
Bsa International S.a. V. Hugh Irvine And Others
...thing as the quantification of that loss: see per Lord Drummond Young in McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton Ltd. v The Abercromby Motor Group Ltd. 2003 SCLR323 at para.[34] and in Euro Pools Plc v Clydeside Steel Fabrications Ltd. 2003 SLT 411 at para.[11]. The word "contingent" should be construed......
-
Albert Bartlett & Sons (airdrie) Limited V. Gilchrist & Lynn Limited+atlas Ward Structures Limited+briggs Amasco Limited
...1 AC 344; East Ham Corporation v Bernard Sunley & Sons Ltd [1966] AC 406; McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton Ltd v Abercromby Motor Company 2003 SCLR 323; McGlinn v Waltham Contractors Ltd (No. 3), [2007] EWHC 149 (TCC) [2008] 111 Con LR 1; George Fischer v Multi Design Consultants Ltd [1998] 61 Co......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Collateral Warranties: Assignment And Rights Of Action To Sue For Breach Of Contract
...interest in the building and consequently could not recover loss (McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton Ltd v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd, 2003 SCLR 323). The court held that BDP's argument was incorrect - the error was the assertion that in a case based on breach of contract the only loss suffered......
2 books & journal articles
-
Defects
...Ltd v Panatown Ltd [2001] 1 aC 518 at 591, per Lord Millett; McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton Ltd v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd (2002) 100 Con Lr 63 at 79 [29]–80 [31], per Lord Drummond Young; Casbee Properties Pty Ltd v Patoka Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCa 361; Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil......
-
Black Holes and Revelations on the Transferred Loss Doctrine
...has been sustained, wholly or partly, by a person other than a party to the contract.”2 2 McLaren Murdoch v The Abercromby Motor Group 2003 SCLR 323 at para 33 per Lord Drummond Young. In other words, following a breach of contract the contracting party who is not in breach has not suffered......