McLAREN MURDOCH & HAMILTON Ltd Pursuers against THE ABERCROMBY MOTOR GROUP Ltd Defenders
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Court of Session (Outer House) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
- Scottish Widows Services Ltd v Harmon/CRM Facades Ltd
- Slemming v Ross
-
Upton Park Homes Limited V. Macdonalds, Solicitors
...economic harm brought about by the alleged conduct of the defenders. In McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton Ltd v The Abercromby Motor Group Ltd 2003 SCLR 323 Lord Drummond Young stated at p. 339F, para [34]: "..... In identifying the loss it is of critical importance to bear in mind that the loss r......
-
John Peebles And Catherine Peebles Against Rembrand Builders Merchants Limited
...note that it has been applied in Scotland in a case not cited by counsel, McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton v The Abercromby Motor Group Ltd 2003 SCLR 323, a decision of Lord Drummond Young, then sitting in the Outer House – a case where reinstatement costs were awarded. I found the Australian cas......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Collateral Warranties: Assignment And Rights Of Action To Sue For Breach Of Contract
...interest in the building and consequently could not recover loss (McLaren Murdoch & Hamilton Ltd v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd, 2003 SCLR 323). The court held that BDP's argument was incorrect - the error was the assertion that in a case based on breach of contract the only loss suffered......
2 books & journal articles
-
Defects
...Ltd v Panatown Ltd [2001] 1 aC 518 at 591, per Lord Millett; McLaren Murdoch and Hamilton Ltd v Abercromby Motor Group Ltd (2002) 100 Con Lr 63 at 79 [29]–80 [31], per Lord Drummond Young; Casbee Properties Pty Ltd v Patoka Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCa 361; Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil......
-
Black Holes and Revelations on the Transferred Loss Doctrine
...has been sustained, wholly or partly, by a person other than a party to the contract.”2 2 McLaren Murdoch v The Abercromby Motor Group 2003 SCLR 323 at para 33 per Lord Drummond Young. In other words, following a breach of contract the contracting party who is not in breach has not suffered......