McLeod v Power

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1898
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • King and Another v Hoare
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 25 November 1844
    ...v. Junkin, 1888, 24 L. R. Ir. 40. Explained, In re King and Beesley; Ex parte Horner, [1895] 1 Q. B. 189. Applied, M'Leod v. Power, [1898] 2 Ch. 295. Not applied, Beck v. Pierce, 1889, 23 Q. B. D. 316 Weall v. James, 1893, 68 L. T. 515; 4 R. 356. Referred to, Baker v. Sayers, 1868, 17 L. T.......
  • Chan Chiu-hung v Pantex Carment Factory And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 10 January 1974
    ...any one of the joint contractors such judgment may be pleaded as a bar to further proceedings against the others (NcLeod v. Power (1898) 2 Ch. 295). And where two defendants are sued on a claim on which the plaintiff has a right of action alternatively, but not jointly, a judgment against o......
  • Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority and Tri Stra Latin America Ltd
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 20 May 2008
    ...were liable for negligence and/or breach of contract. The plea was therefore one of joint and several liability. (iv) The decision in Mc Leod v. Power [1898] 2 Ch. 295 which recognized that even where there were joint debtors, a default judgment against one does not stand as a bar to procee......
  • Pim, Brothers, Ltd, v Thomas Coyle and Margaret Coyle
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 30 April 1903
    ...of this motion. (1) Before Palles, C.B., and Gibson and Boyd, JJ. (2) 2 I. Jur. (N. S.) 256 (3) 20 L. R. Ir. 282. (4) 68 L. T. 515. (5) [1898] 2 Ch. 295. (1) 13 M. & W. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT