Meekins v Henson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1962
Date1962
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • Egger v Chelmsford (Viscount)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 22 Julio 1964
    ...by Mr Justice Slade in Longdon-Griffiths v. Smith 1951, 1 King's Bench, p. 295 and in the case of partners by Mr Justice Winn in Meekins v. Henson 1962, 3 Weekly Law Reports, p. 299. I entirely agree with those decisions. Applying the like principle in this case, it means that the three mem......
  • Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 Diciembre 2002
    ...act or omission must have been performed in the ordinary course of the business of the party sought to be made vicariously liable. In Meekins v Henson [1964] 1 QB 472, 477 Winn J observed that section 10 of the Partnership Act produced "a necessary equation of a partnership firm with emplo......
  • Akbar and Others t/a Mumtaz Paan House
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • 5 Diciembre 1997
    ...1 BVC 455 C & E Commrs v Glassborow VAT(1974) 1 BVC 4 Johnson v Blackpool General Commrs TAX[1996] BTC 501 Meekins v Henson UNK[1962] 1 All ER 899 Santi Bag Restaurant VAT(MAN/93/1177) No. 13,114; [1996] BVC 4073 The Bengal Brasserie VAT(LON/90/604) No. 5925; [1991] BVC 1363 Civil penalty -......
  • Yeung Kam Fuk v Len Shing Construction Co Ltd And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 24 Marzo 1986
    ...of the Partnership Ordinance. The English Act which is identical in these circumstances, was considered in the case of Meekins v. Henson (1964) 1 QB 472, and it was concluded that this is the vicarious liability section. If that be right, liability is expressly excluded to "a partner in the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Legal Profession
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 Diciembre 2004
    ...his rights under s 10 and insisting on making all the partners primarily, as opposed to secondarily, liable: see also Meekins v Henson[1964] 1 QB 472. An entrustment to a partner as principal followed by a breach for which the firm is vicariously liable, however, involves a two-step demonst......
  • Parties
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Libel and Slander Actions
    • 17 Junio 2004
    ...should involve an examination of the relevant legislation governing the rights and liabilities of partners. Meekins v. Henson, [1964] 1 Q.B. 472, per WinnJ. at 476 (Q.B.). In British Columbia, the relevant legislation is the Partnership Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 348, which provides in section ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT