Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1919
Year1919
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
62 cases
  • Daud; Mohamed Lajan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1963
  • Murray v Ministry of Defence
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 May 1988
    ...of the fact of restraint by the suspect is an essential element of an arrest. There was some indication to the contrary in Meering v. Grahame-White Aviation Co. Ltd. (1919) 122 L.T. 44. In that case the Court of Appeal divided on the question. Atkin L.J. expressly stated that awareness of ......
  • PP v Tan Seow Chuan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1985
  • Davidson v Chief Constable of the North Wales Police and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 April 1993
    ...to Aitkin v BedwellENR ((1827) M & M 1084),Grinham v WilleyENR ((1849) 4 H & N 496) and Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd ((1920) 122 LT 44) in which the essential test of a defendant's liability was whether he had given information to a properly constituted authority on which it migh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Dead loss: damages for posthumous breach of the moral right of integrity.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 1, August - April 2016
    • 1 August 2016
    ...above n 33, 276 n 145, quoting Weldon v Home Office [1990] 3 WLR 465, 469 (Ralph Gibson LJ); Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd (1919) 122 LT 44, 53-4 (Atkin (104) 'Loss of amenities' is the name 'commonly and conveniently (but not ... very happily)' given to the non-economic consequen......
  • WHAT DOES TORT LAW PROTECT?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...(Second) of Torts (St Paul, Minnesota: American Law Institute Publishers, 1965) §§ 35(c) and 42. 30Meering v Graham-White Aviation Co Ltd(1920) 122 LT 44; Murray v Ministry of Defence[1988] 1 WLR 692. 31Murray v Ministry of Defence[1988] 1 WLR 692, discussing Herring v Boyle(1834) 1 Cr M & ......
  • Objection, purpose and normality: three ways in which the courts have inhibited safeguarding
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald The Journal of Adult Protection No. 14-6, November 2012
    • 30 November 2012
    ...J. (2011) A Stolen Life, Simon & Schuster, London.HL v. United Kingdom (2004) 40 EHRR 761.Meering v. Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd (1920) 122 LT 44, 51, 53.P (otherwise known as MIG) and Q (otherwise known as MEG) v. Surrey County Council, CA, LA and theEquality and Human Rights Commission ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT