Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Birkenhead Assessment Committee
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1901 |
Year | 1901 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Armstrong, Appellant; The Commissioner of Valuation in Ireland, Respondent
...30 L. R. Ir. 137. (3) 8 A. C. 658. (1) 2 Bulst. 354. (2) 2 Cowp. 550. (1) 10 A. & E. 157. (1) 1 Q. B. at 580. (2) [1900] A. C. 150. (3) [1901] A. C. 175. (4) [1895] 2 Q. B. (1) 17 Ves. 335. (2) John. 174. (1) 4 Ir. C. L. R. 394. (1) [1895] 2 I. R. 603. (2) 8 Cox, 314. (3) 2 E. & E. 386. (1)......
-
Decision Nº RA 480 1993. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 22-02-2000
...R v Rhymney Railway Co (1869) LR 4 QB 276 per Mellor J at 283; Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Birkenhead Union Assessment Committee [1901] AC 175 per Lord Halsbury LC at Liability to the rate only arises at all because there is occupation; and the liability arises in respect of the occupa......
-
Telereal Trillium v Kevin Hewitt (Valuation Officer)
...other early authorities, the considerations relevant to rateability and valuation may often overlap (see eg Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Birkenhead Union Assessment Committee [1901] AC 175, 184–185 per Lord The Court of Appeal authorities 43 I turn first to Hoare v National Trust [1998......
- Hoare v National Trust; National Trust v Spratling
Request a trial to view additional results