Mesnard v Aldridge

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1799
Date01 January 1799
CourtHigh Court

English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 612

IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS.

Mesnard
and
Aldridge

Feb. 21. mesnard v. aldridge. (The conditions of the sale by auction, printed and pasted up under the auctioneer's box, where he declares that the conditions are as usual, is sufficient notice to purchasers of the conditions.) This was an action on the case, on the warranty of a horse. The horse was sold by the defendant, by auction, at his repository, and warranted sound. The sale took place on the Wednesday. At the time of the sale, the auctioneer announced that the conditions of the sale were as usual. These conditions of sale were proved to be contained m a printed paper, pasted up under the auctioneer's box ; and by one of them, all horses purchased there, in case of any unsoundness discovered, are required to be returned before the evening of the second day after the sale. The horse in question was not returned till the Saturday. When returned by the plaintiff, he was informed that it was too late, as he ought, pursuant to the conditions of the sale, to be returned on the evening of Friday Erskine, for the plaintiff, contended, That there was no evi-[272]-dence of notice of the conditions of the sale, sufficient to bind him That the auctioneer had not proclaimed them publicly ; so that the plaintiff might have been ignorant that he purchased under such conditions. But, *t all events, he contended, That if the defendant, who was not the owner of the horse, had not paid over the price (which if he had, he admitted he would not have been liable) that he remained subject to this action, on the warranty. 3...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Lian Hock & Co; Malayan Miners Company (M) Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1966
  • Malayan Miners Company (M) Ltd v Lian Hock & Company
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 June 1966
    ...auction: at [34]. Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 (folld) Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 90 (refd) Mesnard v Aldridge (1801) 3 Esp 271; 170 ER 612 (folld) Schneider v Heath (1813) 3 Camp 506; 170 ER 1462 (refd) Ward v Hobbs (1878) 4 App Cas 20 (refd) Sale of Goods Act 1893 (c......
  • Hill v Thompson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 1 January 1817
    ...back after the expiration of that period, although the auctioneer may not have paid over the price to his employer. Mesnard v. Aldridge, 3 Esp. 271, Kenyon, C J. 1801. A party, sued on a warranty of a horse, may call a prior vendor, who sold with a, warranty, to prove the animal sound. Brig......
  • Macdonald & Fraser v Henderson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 3 November 1882
    ...of sale between the pursuers and defender. 1Laing v. Hain, May 21, 1853, 15 D. 667, 25 Scot. Jur. 405; Mesnard v. Aldridge, Feb. 21, 1801, 3 Esp. 271; Bywater v. Richardson, May 24, 1834, 1 Adolph. and Ell. 508; Bell's Prin. sec. 2Henderson v. Stevenson, Nov. 25, 1873, ante, vol. i. 215, af......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT