Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1894
Year1894
Date1894
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
86 cases
  • Indyka v Indyka
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 May 1967
    ...not prevent us from recognising the New South Wales decree. 5In order to understand the reason given it is necessary to start from Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier [1895] A.C. 517 . The Court in Travers v. Holley accepted, as they were bound to do, the general proposition that that case estab......
  • Mountbatten v Mountbatten
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Russ (orse. Geffers) v Russ (Russ orse. De Waele Intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 7 June 1962
    ...since English law regards questions of personal status as governed by the law of the domicil (see ( Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier. 1895 Appeal Cases, page 517) how, it may be asked, can the conclusion be avoided that the marriage of the 29th April 1942 was valid In the eye of English law, so f......
  • Bater v Bater
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Harvey v. Farnie , ( 1882 ) 8 App. Cas. 43 , and Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier , [ 1895 ] A. C. 517 , applied ... The resolution of the judges in Lolley's Case , (1812) Russ. & Ry. 237, must be treated as ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...2019 ONSC 6394; Zeineldin v Elshikh, 2020 ONSC 1160; Antonyuk v Antonyuk, 2020 ONSC 644, aff’d 2021 ONCA 748. Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier, [1895] AC 517; Kadri v Kadri, 2015 ONSC Armitage v Attorney General, [1906] P 135. Travers v Holley, [1953] P 246 (Eng CA). Chapter 7: Divorce: Jurisdicti......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...NSJ No 76 (CA); Ho v Lau, 2019 ONSC 5573; Novikova v Lyzo, 2019 ONCA 821; Al Sabki v Al Jajeh, 2019 ONSC 6394. Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier, [1895] AC 517; Kadri v Kadri, 2015 ONSC Armitage v Attorney General, [1906] P 135. Travers v Holley, [1953] P 246 (Eng CA). Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Sco......
  • LOCAL DEVELOPMENTS ON FOREIGN MARRIAGES AND DIVORCES:
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...Ong Siew Ling, “Financial Relief in Singapore after a Foreign Divorce”[1993] SJLS 431. 24 c53. 25 c55. 26 Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier [1895] AC 517. 27 Armitage v Attorney-General [1906] P 135. 28 See Travers v Holly[1953] P 246 and Armitage v Attorney-General[1906] P 135. This may have been ......